Control: tags -1 + pending
On Tue, 2016-11-22 at 12:58 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On 2016-11-22 12:45, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> > [Adam D. Barratt]
> >> Yes, please. I've flagged the current upload for rejection. Once you
> >> receive the confirmation from dak that the rejection has been
On 2016-11-22 12:45, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Adam D. Barratt]
Yes, please. I've flagged the current upload for rejection. Once you
receive the confirmation from dak that the rejection has been
actioned, please upload the new build.
When I build in a fresh jessie chroot, I get this
[Adam D. Barratt]
> Yes, please. I've flagged the current upload for rejection. Once you
> receive the confirmation from dak that the rejection has been
> actioned, please upload the new build.
When I build in a fresh jessie chroot, I get this debdiff:
% debdiff
On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 20:49 +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Adam D. Barratt]
> > I'm a little confused as to how that package was built, based on the
> > result of some of our automated checks.
>
> I build it using debuild on my jessie laptop.
Okay.
> > Specifically, debfdiffs of the
[Adam D. Barratt]
> I'm a little confused as to how that package was built, based on the
> result of some of our automated checks.
I build it using debuild on my jessie laptop.
> Specifically, debfdiffs of the binary package show that isenkram-cli
> has lost its prerm and postinst scripts, and
On 2016-11-20 20:03, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Jonathan Wiltshire]
Please go ahead.
Thank you. I uploaded the new package a few minutes ago.
I'm a little confused as to how that package was built, based on the
result of some of our automated checks.
Specifically, debfdiffs of the
[Jonathan Wiltshire]
> Please go ahead.
Thank you. I uploaded the new package a few minutes ago.
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
Control: tag -1 confirmed
Hi,
On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 01:29:12PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Hi. Today I discovered that isenkram in Jessie no longer provide the
> full set of package proposals any more. The problem was introduced when
> anonscm.debian.org switched from http to https.
Hi. Did anyone have time to look at the isenkram patch for Jessie?
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi. Today I discovered that isenkram in Jessie no longer provide the
full set of package proposals any more. The problem was introduced when
anonscm.debian.org switched from http
10 matches
Mail list logo
