On Mon, 24 Oct 2016 07:23:30 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> I (obviously) agree. How about this patch? I'm seeking seconds for
> this proposal.
>
> diff --git a/policy.sgml b/policy.sgml
> index 9cd182b..ab4f736 100644
> --- a/policy.sgml
> +++ b/policy.sgml
> @@ -9610,9 +9610,7 @@ ln -fs ../sbin
Le lundi, 24 octobre 2016, 07.23:30 h CET Colin Watson a écrit :
> Control: tag -1 patch
>
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 08:00:23PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> > Policy section "Permissions and owners" probably shouldn't recommend
> > contacting the base-passwd maintainer when selecting a username fo
Colin Watson writes:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 08:00:23PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> Policy section "Permissions and owners" probably shouldn't recommend
>> contacting the base-passwd maintainer when selecting a username for a
>> dynamically-allocated UID created by a postinst maintscript. It
Control: tag -1 patch
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 08:00:23PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> Policy section "Permissions and owners" probably shouldn't recommend
> contacting the base-passwd maintainer when selecting a username for a
> dynamically-allocated UID created by a postinst maintscript. It shou
Package: debian-policy
Version: 3.9.8.0
Severity: wishlist
Policy section "Permissions and owners" probably shouldn't recommend
contacting the base-passwd maintainer when selecting a username for a
dynamically-allocated UID created by a postinst maintscript. It should
continue to recommend contac
5 matches
Mail list logo
