Bug#842641: Sv: Bug#842641: RFS: autoconf/2.69-10~bpo8+1

2016-10-31 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 04:50:49PM +, Kristian Klausen wrote: > BTW Ben if you want to take care for the backport by yourself, I'm happy to > cancel > or give you the task :) Please, be my guest, you are welcome to take this. Thank you.

Bug#842641: Sv: Bug#842641: RFS: autoconf/2.69-10~bpo8+1

2016-10-31 Thread Kristian Klausen
@debian.org> Sendt: 31. oktober 2016 16:56 Til: Ben Pfaff; Alexander Wirt; 842...@bugs.debian.org Cc: pfaff...@debian.org; klausenb...@hotmail.com Emne: Re: Bug#842641: RFS: autoconf/2.69-10~bpo8+1   Hi Alex, Ben, Kristian >Gianfranco, are you planning to take responsibility for u

Bug#842641: RFS: autoconf/2.69-10~bpo8+1

2016-10-31 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
Hi Alex, Ben, Kristian >Gianfranco, are you planning to take responsibility for uploading this >as it changes in Debian proper? It is probably not a big >responsibility, because autoconf changes rarely. I'm willing to sponsor >the uploads. I would prefer Kristian to take care of this, but

Bug#842641: RFS: autoconf/2.69-10~bpo8+1

2016-10-31 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 04:24:10PM +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > On Mon, 31 Oct 2016, Ben Pfaff wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 11:16:18AM +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > > Hi Ben, > > > > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "autoconf". > > > > Some packages depends on

Bug#842641: RFS: autoconf/2.69-10~bpo8+1

2016-10-31 Thread Alexander Wirt
On Mon, 31 Oct 2016, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 11:16:18AM +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > > Hi Ben, > > > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "autoconf". > > > Some packages depends on the new --runstatedir option which was added in > > > 2.69-9, > > > before

Bug#842641: RFS: autoconf/2.69-10~bpo8+1

2016-10-31 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 11:16:18AM +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote: > Hi Ben, > > > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "autoconf". > > Some packages depends on the new --runstatedir option which was added in > > 2.69-9, > > before they can be built for jessie-backports. Ex connman. > >

Bug#842641: RFS: autoconf/2.69-10~bpo8+1

2016-10-30 Thread Kristian Klausen
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "autoconf". Some packages depends on the new --runstatedir option which was added in 2.69-9, before they can be built for jessie-backports. Ex connman. Is this request okay with you Ben, or do