Bug#842963: Please provide 0.10 (future) in experimental

2016-11-03 Thread Sergei Golovan
Hi Daniel, On Thu, Nov 3, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Daniel Scharon wrote: > On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 18:19:04 +0100 Victor Seva wrote: >> On 11/02/2016 05:47 PM, W. Martin Borgert wrote: >> > Package: prosody >> > Version: 0.9.10-1 >> > Severity: wishlist >>

Bug#842963: Please provide 0.10 (future) in experimental

2016-11-03 Thread Daniel Scharon
Hi Matthew, > With my upstream hat on, I'd prefer not having package name collisions > with our upstream repository. Our repository provides automated > nightly builds, and when people install 'prosody-0.10' that's what > they believe they are getting. > > A prosody-0.10 package in Debian would

Bug#842963: Please provide 0.10 (future) in experimental

2016-11-03 Thread Matthew Wild
On 3 November 2016 at 09:20, Daniel Scharon wrote: > maybe as a separate package 'prosody-0.10' like upstream does? > http://packages.prosody.im/debian/pool/main/p/prosody-0.10/ > that way an eventual upload to unstable could be possible as well. With my upstream

Bug#842963: Please provide 0.10 (future) in experimental

2016-11-03 Thread Daniel Scharon
On Wed, 2 Nov 2016 18:19:04 +0100 Victor Seva wrote: > On 11/02/2016 05:47 PM, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > > Package: prosody > > Version: 0.9.10-1 > > Severity: wishlist > > > > https://hg.prosody.im/0.10 contains the next planned release of > > prosody. It would be nice to

Bug#842963: Please provide 0.10 (future) in experimental

2016-11-02 Thread Victor Seva
On 11/02/2016 05:47 PM, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > Package: prosody > Version: 0.9.10-1 > Severity: wishlist > > https://hg.prosody.im/0.10 contains the next planned release of > prosody. It would be nice to have it already in Debian to get the > bugs out and align it with Debian and the

Bug#842963: Please provide 0.10 (future) in experimental

2016-11-02 Thread W. Martin Borgert
Package: prosody Version: 0.9.10-1 Severity: wishlist https://hg.prosody.im/0.10 contains the next planned release of prosody. It would be nice to have it already in Debian to get the bugs out and align it with Debian and the prosody-modules package. In experimental, not unstable, of course.