Hey,
thank you for analyzing the bug and the fix :-)
@Philipp: I will upload a new version to the Debian archive as soon as it
available.
Best regards,
Jan
>
> Philipp Marek:
>> But fs/mount.h does
>>
>> #include
>>
>> and it seems that the linux/mount.h contains everything that AUFS
Philipp Marek:
> But fs/mount.h does
>
> #include
>
> and it seems that the linux/mount.h contains everything that AUFS needs.
>
>
> I've got the module up and running for a few hours, mounting/unmounting
> directories all the time (in a testsuite)... so it looks as if it's not
>
> Caution: linux/mount.h is not the same as fs/mount.h, see
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/fs/mount.h
> vs.
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/include/linux/mount.h
Thanks for noticing.
But fs/mount.h does
#include
and it seems that the linux/mount.h
Jan Luca Naumann:
> Caution: linux/mount.h is not the same as fs/mount.h, see
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/fs/mount.h
> vs.
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/include/linux/mount.h
Exactly.
How about specifying EXTRA_CFLAGS in your "make" cmdline?
J. R. Okajima
Caution: linux/mount.h is not the same as fs/mount.h, see
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/fs/mount.h
vs.
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/include/linux/mount.h
Jan
Am 10. November 2016 09:56:49 MEZ, schrieb Philipp Marek
:
>Hi Jan,
>
>
>>
Hi Jan,
> the file fs/mount.h belongs to the normal kernel source. Upstream suggest
> to build the aufs-module inside the kernel source tree.
Yes, by replacing the relative #include paths with absolute ones I got it
working.
> Since this is not
> simply possible for the automatic Debian
Hey Phil,
the file fs/mount.h belongs to the normal kernel source. Upstream suggest to
build the aufs-module inside the kernel source tree. Since this is not simply
possible for the automatic Debian package builds, I have to think about a good
solution for thr Debian package. If I find a good
7 matches
Mail list logo