On 11/18/2016 06:24 AM, Guido Günther wrote:
Exactly. That's why NEWS.Debian is nicer iff the user libvirt-qemu
exists but with "wrong" (legacy) uid/gid on existing installations and
Debconf is better for new installations where the uid/gid is already
taken.
Thanks for the debconf/NEWS.Debian
Hi Mauricio,
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 07:53:55PM -0200, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
> On 11/17/2016 05:37 PM, Guido Günther wrote:
> > I'm basically fine with all of this (but did not du any actual testing)
>
> Cool.
>
> > but we should not warn if the user/group already exists (even with
On 11/17/2016 05:37 PM, Guido Günther wrote:
I'm basically fine with all of this (but did not du any actual testing)
Cool.
but we should not warn if the user/group already exists (even with the
wrong uid). Otherwise we'd warn over and over again, we don't want to
force users to change
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 10:51:40AM -0200, Mauricio Faria de Oliveira wrote:
> If the libvirt-qemu user/group already exists with different
> uid/gid than the allocated numeric ID (64055), or if this ID
> is already in use by another user/group, stop/ask user if it
> is OK to continue (e.g., no
If the libvirt-qemu user/group already exists with different
uid/gid than the allocated numeric ID (64055), or if this ID
is already in use by another user/group, stop/ask user if it
is OK to continue (e.g., no plans to perform guest migration
over NFS) or abort to go fix the problem.
5 matches
Mail list logo
