Bug#844539: Please revert DN related behaviour change introduced in 3.5.6

2016-11-18 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2016-11-18 Guido Günther wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 07:57:05PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: [...] > > Would you consider this to be a serious issue for libvirt? i.e. should > > we block unfixed gnutls from propagating to testing? > I don't think that would be a good

Bug#844539: Please revert DN related behaviour change introduced in 3.5.6

2016-11-18 Thread Guido Günther
Hi, On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 07:57:05PM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: > On 2016-11-16 Guido Günther wrote: > > Package: libgnutls30 > > Version: 3.5.6-4 > > Severity: normal > > > Hi, > > 3.5.6 introduced a behaviour change that breaks libvirt. See > [...] > > Would you

Bug#844539: Please revert DN related behaviour change introduced in 3.5.6

2016-11-17 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2016-11-16 Guido Günther wrote: > Package: libgnutls30 > Version: 3.5.6-4 > Severity: normal > Hi, > 3.5.6 introduced a behaviour change that breaks libvirt. See [...] Would you consider this to be a serious issue for libvirt? i.e. should we block unfixed gnutls from

Bug#844539: Please revert DN related behaviour change introduced in 3.5.6

2016-11-16 Thread Guido Günther
On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 06:54:41PM +0100, Guido Günther wrote: > Package: libgnutls30 > Version: 3.5.6-4 > Severity: normal > > Hi, > 3.5.6 introuced a behaviour change that breaks libvirt. See > > https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnutls-devel/2016-November/008224.html > > and look for

Bug#844539: Please revert DN related behaviour change introduced in 3.5.6

2016-11-16 Thread Guido Günther
Package: libgnutls30 Version: 3.5.6-4 Severity: normal Hi, 3.5.6 introuced a behaviour change that breaks libvirt. See https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnutls-devel/2016-November/008224.html and look for "FAIL: virnettlssessiontest". The upstream discussion is here: