On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 09:31:47PM +0100, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
>
> Hi Adrian,
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 04:58:34PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 08:54:06PM +0100, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> > >...
> > > On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 07:43:42AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
Hi Adrian,
On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 04:58:34PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 08:54:06PM +0100, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> >...
> > On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 07:43:42AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> >...
> > > Relevant part (hopefully):
> > > > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..
On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 08:54:06PM +0100, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
>...
> On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 07:43:42AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>...
> > Relevant part (hopefully):
> > > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wall -g
> > > -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/<>=.
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 07:43:42AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi,
> Source: isatapd
> Version: 0.9.7-2
> Severity: serious
> Tags: stretch sid
> User: debian...@lists.debian.org
> Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161118 qa-ftbfs
> Justification: FTBFS on amd64
>
> Hi,
>
>
Source: isatapd
Version: 0.9.7-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161118 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> gcc
5 matches
Mail list logo