Bug#844943: python-bleach: FTBFS: Tests failures

2017-03-10 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Sat, 25 Feb 2017 01:05:29 -0500 Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:52:01 -0500 Scott Kitterman > wrote: > > On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 20:54:02 +0530 Pirate Praveen > wrote: > > ... > > > Seems python-html5lib was

Bug#844943: python-bleach: FTBFS: Tests failures

2017-02-24 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 14:52:01 -0500 Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 20:54:02 +0530 Pirate Praveen wrote: > ... > > Seems python-html5lib was updated without checking reverse dependency > > compatibility

Bug#844943: python-bleach: FTBFS: Tests failures

2017-02-14 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 20:54:02 +0530 Pirate Praveen wrote: ... > Seems python-html5lib was updated without checking reverse dependency > compatibility https://github.com/mozilla/bleach/issues/212 > Based on recent discussions in the upstream bugs, it looks like they are

Bug#844943: python-bleach: FTBFS: Tests failures

2017-01-13 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Fri, 13 Jan 2017 10:58:28 -0500 Barry Warsaw wrote: > Apologies. Tags pushed. Let me know when you have a repo or branch for me to > test and I will do QA on pip and friends. I have pushed it to https://git.fosscommunity.in/praveen/html5lib Though two tests are failing

Bug#844943: python-bleach: FTBFS: Tests failures

2017-01-13 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Jan 13, 2017, at 09:16 PM, Pirate Praveen wrote: >I would prefer this approach as I prefer to avoid maintaining two >versions if possible. I cloned html5lib.git repo, but found recent tags >missing there. Can you push them? Apologies. Tags pushed. Let me know when you have a repo or branch

Bug#844943: python-bleach: FTBFS: Tests failures

2017-01-13 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 10:39:29 -0500 Barry Warsaw wrote: > I had a conversation with the upstream pip maintainer. In theory it may be > possible. In practice it's often a nightmare to go backwards. I'm willing to > help try to make that happen if others are also willing to

Bug#844943: python-bleach: FTBFS: Tests failures

2017-01-10 Thread Barry Warsaw
Here's another thought. What if we upload a new html5lib source package containing seven-9's? I know we're in freeze, but this may make the most sense. Then, packages which need the old version like bleach can depend on the seven-9's version and that won't affect packages which require the

Bug#844943: python-bleach: FTBFS: Tests failures

2017-01-10 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Jan 10, 2017, at 09:37 AM, Pirate Praveen wrote: >bleach and other projects using html5lib seems to have locked the version of >html5lib to the one with 7 nines. Can we also go back to the older version >which works? I had a conversation with the upstream pip maintainer. In theory it may be

Bug#844943: python-bleach: FTBFS: Tests failures

2017-01-09 Thread Pirate Praveen
On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 20:54:02 +0530 Pirate Praveen wrote: > Seems python-html5lib was updated without checking reverse dependency > compatibility https://github.com/mozilla/bleach/issues/212 > bleach and other projects using html5lib seems to have locked the version of

Bug#844943: python-bleach: FTBFS: Tests failures

2016-12-19 Thread Pirate Praveen
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/mozilla/bleach/issues/212 On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 07:57:35 +0100 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on > amd64. > > Relevant part (hopefully): > > Traceback (most recent call last):

Bug#844943: python-bleach: FTBFS: Tests failures

2016-11-18 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Source: python-bleach Version: 1.4.2-1 Severity: serious Tags: stretch sid User: debian...@lists.debian.org Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161118 qa-ftbfs Justification: FTBFS on amd64 Hi, During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on amd64. Relevant part (hopefully): >