forwarded https://github.com/enthought/traits/issues/363
We ran into this in Ubuntu and I just uploaded a simple change to disable
these two tests:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/319812483/python-traits_4.6.0-1build1_4.6.0-1ubuntu1.diff.gz
I also filed a bug upstream as I could reproduce it consi
Hi,
I intentionally ssh-ed into a machine without enabling X and have
build there in pbuilder. The build runs fine.
Just to add an extra data point
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 11:20:55AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I intentionally ssh-ed into a machine without enabling X and have
> build there in pbuilder. The build runs fine.
My build history for this package:
Status: successful python-traits_4.5.0-1_amd64-20161126T172508Z
Status: failed
severity 846771 important
retitle 846771 python-traits: FTBFS randomly (failing tests)
thanks
Tried to build this 50 times today, on 9 different autobuilders.
It failed 17 times, but it was always on 2 of the 9 autobuilders.
This is consistent with the fact that Lucas was able to reproduce it
in
Source: python-traits
Version: 4.6.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20161202 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/
I cannot reproduce this.
--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi
On 01/01/17 at 17:00 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> I cannot reproduce this.
I could on 2016-12-19. Could you post a build log and diff it with mine?
Thanks
Lucas
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, Jan 01, 2017 at 02:05:44PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> I could on 2016-12-19. Could you post a build log and diff it with mine?
Attached. I couldn't see anything interesting in the diff, but the failing
tests succeed and are not skipped.
--
WBR, wRAR
python-traits_4.6.0-1_amd64.log.
On 01/01/17 at 18:58 +0500, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 01, 2017 at 02:05:44PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > I could on 2016-12-19. Could you post a build log and diff it with mine?
> Attached. I couldn't see anything interesting in the diff, but the failing
> tests succeed and are n
9 matches
Mail list logo