Hi!
On Mon, 2018-02-05 at 08:46:33 +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> Fair enough. Personally, I’m happy with either name. Certainly, “golang” is
> used in enough places that people know what is meant. As long as we refer
> to the language (e.g. in the section description) by “Go”, I think we
> sh
Fair enough. Personally, I’m happy with either name. Certainly, “golang” is
used in enough places that people know what is meant. As long as we refer
to the language (e.g. in the section description) by “Go”, I think we
should be good.
On Mon, Feb 5, 2018 at 1:46 AM, Guillem Jover wrote:
> Hi!
>
Hi!
On Sun, 2018-02-04 at 23:37:39 +0100, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
> Matthias Klose writes:
> > Please could you consider using go as new tag name? golang resembles
> > too much to one particular implementation name. For other languages
> > we have python, not cpython, pypy, jython, we have ja
Hi Matthias,
Matthias Klose writes:
> Please could you consider using go as new tag name? golang resembles too much
> to one particular implementation name. For other languages we have python,
> not
> cpython, pypy, jython, we have java, not openjdk.
Indeed, the language is called Go, and gol
Please could you consider using go as new tag name? golang resembles too much
to one particular implementation name. For other languages we have python, not
cpython, pypy, jython, we have java, not openjdk.
Matthias
5 matches
Mail list logo
