Bug#847681: packaging repository and sid diverging? Various fixes needed.

On Fri, 3 Feb 2017 01:55:10 -0800 Nye Liu wrote: > Why is /lib/systemd/system/nfs-common.service being linked to /dev/null > in debian/nfs-common.links? Ignore. I see that statd, idmpad, and gssd have their own systemd units now.

Bug#847681: packaging repository and sid diverging? Various fixes needed.

Also a stupid question: Why is /lib/systemd/system/nfs-common.service being linked to /dev/null in debian/nfs-common.links? It seems to prevent idmapd, statd, and gssd from being started if systemd is used, unless you remove the link and forcibly "systemctl enable nfs-common"

Bug#847681: packaging repository and sid diverging? Various fixes needed.

On Sat, 17 Dec 2016 04:54:21 +0100 =?UTF-8?Q?Rapha=c3=abl_Halimi?= wrote: > Please explain exactly in what way would my patch introduce > *incompatible* changes. It's *trivial*, it only adds a single option, > and a comment to hint that NFSv4 must be disabled in rpc.nfsd

Bug#847681: packaging repository and sid diverging? Various fixes needed.

Hi Andreas Henriksson, Le 14/12/2016 à 08:21, Andreas Henriksson a écrit : > Congrats on completely derailing a thread that for once was about > proper mainenance and solving a bigger problem into becoming > about your pet peeve. Please feel free to stop CCing me if you > don't actually want my

Bug#847681: packaging repository and sid diverging? Various fixes needed.

On 15/12/16 11:44, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > On 14/12/16 23:41, Ben Hutchings wrote: >> On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 20:55 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: [...] >>> Thanks for providing this feedback >>> >>> I've done the following: - forked the upstream repository >> >> The existing packaging repos are

Bug#847681: packaging repository and sid diverging? Various fixes needed.

On 14/12/16 23:41, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 20:55 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: [...] >> Thanks for providing this feedback >> >> I've done the following: - forked the upstream repository > > The existing packaging repos are also based on the upstream git > repo. > OK, I

Bug#847681: packaging repository and sid diverging? Various fixes needed.

On 15/12/16 09:50, Sven Geggus wrote: > Daniel Pocock schrieb am Mittwoch, den 14. Dezember um 13:35 Uhr: > >> If the latest NFS / kernel combination in sid definitely won't work >> without gss-proxy then you could open an RC bug against the nfs-utils >> package on that basis. > > I assume,

Bug#847681: packaging repository and sid diverging? Various fixes needed.

Daniel Pocock schrieb am Mittwoch, den 14. Dezember um 13:35 Uhr: > If the latest NFS / kernel combination in sid definitely won't work > without gss-proxy then you could open an RC bug against the nfs-utils > package on that basis. I assume, that it does work (as it also works in stable), but

Bug#847681: packaging repository and sid diverging? Various fixes needed.

Sven Geggus writes: > Daniel Pocock schrieb am Mittwoch, den 14. Dezember um 11:01 Uhr: > >> Would you consider uploading it or proposing it in mentors.debian.net? >> Please also send details on the gss-proxy ITP bug. > > Robbie is the one with the ITP bug, not me :)

Bug#847681: packaging repository and sid diverging? Various fixes needed.

On Wed, 2016-12-14 at 09:38 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > On 14/12/16 08:24, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 08:11:52AM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > I agree the loss of Debian packaging history is a concern, that is one > > > reason I didn't clobber the existing

Bug#847681: packaging repository and sid diverging? Various fixes needed.

On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 20:55 +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: [...] > Thanks for providing this feedback > > I've done the following: > - forked the upstream repository The existing packaging repos are also based on the upstream git repo. > - created a debian/sid branch > - copied debian/* from

Bug#847681: packaging repository and sid diverging? Various fixes needed.

On 14/12/16 12:12, Sven Geggus wrote: > Daniel Pocock schrieb am Mittwoch, den 14. Dezember um 11:01 Uhr: > >> Would you consider uploading it or proposing it in mentors.debian.net? >> Please also send details on the gss-proxy ITP bug. > > Robbie is the one with the ITP bug, not me :) > > I

Bug#847681: packaging repository and sid diverging? Various fixes needed.

Daniel Pocock schrieb am Mittwoch, den 14. Dezember um 11:01 Uhr: > Would you consider uploading it or proposing it in mentors.debian.net? > Please also send details on the gss-proxy ITP bug. Robbie is the one with the ITP bug, not me :) I just pushed my custom package data to github though:

Bug#847681: packaging repository and sid diverging? Various fixes needed.

On 14/12/16 10:31, Sven Geggus wrote: > Daniel Pocock schrieb am Mittwoch, den 14. Dezember um 09:38 Uhr: > >> They stopped including rpc-svcgssd in the default build as of 1.3.2 and >> recommended gssproxy[1] instead. > > Yes, gssproxy is a working drop-in replacement for rpc.svcgssd in case

Bug#847681: packaging repository and sid diverging? Various fixes needed.

Daniel Pocock schrieb am Mittwoch, den 14. Dezember um 09:38 Uhr: > They stopped including rpc-svcgssd in the default build as of 1.3.2 and > recommended gssproxy[1] instead. Yes, gssproxy is a working drop-in replacement for rpc.svcgssd in case of the nfs4-server use case. Note, that they are

Bug#847681: packaging repository and sid diverging? Various fixes needed.

On 14/12/16 08:24, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 08:11:52AM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> I agree the loss of Debian packaging history is a concern, that is one >> reason I didn't clobber the existing repository and I wrote that we can >> blow this away if there isn't

Bug#847681: packaging repository and sid diverging? Various fixes needed.

On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 08:11:52AM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > On 13/12/16 22:46, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 08:55:34PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: > >> Hi Ben, > >> > >> Thanks for providing this feedback > >> > >> I've done the following: > >> - forked the

Bug#847681: packaging repository and sid diverging? Various fixes needed.

Hello Raphaël Halimi, Congrats on completely derailing a thread that for once was about proper mainenance and solving a bigger problem into becoming about your pet peeve. Please feel free to stop CCing me if you don't actually want my feedback. On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 11:01:19PM +0100, Raphaël

Bug#847681: packaging repository and sid diverging? Various fixes needed.

On 13/12/16 22:46, Andreas Henriksson wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 08:55:34PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> Hi Ben, >> >> Thanks for providing this feedback >> >> I've done the following: >> - forked the upstream repository >> - created a debian/sid branch >> - copied debian/* from jessie

Bug#847681: packaging repository and sid diverging? Various fixes needed.

Le 13/12/2016 à 22:09, Andreas Henriksson a écrit : > I would suggest tagging these both as wontfix. Adding even more options > to the broken concept of /etc/default just adds to the maintenance burden > of having to carry this over via the nfs-utils_env.sh bridge. > > Both

Bug#847681: packaging repository and sid diverging? Various fixes needed.

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 08:55:34PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: > Hi Ben, > > Thanks for providing this feedback > > I've done the following: > - forked the upstream repository > - created a debian/sid branch > - copied debian/* from jessie into that branch and committed > - copied debian/* from

Bug#847681: packaging repository and sid diverging? Various fixes needed.

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 09:52:10PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > On 13/12/16 21:40, Raphaël Halimi wrote: > > Le 13/12/2016 à 21:36, Daniel Pocock a écrit : > >> Do you think you could investigate a little bit more and add > >> details to the bug, maybe have a look in Fedora's repositories

Bug#847681: packaging repository and sid diverging? Various fixes needed.

On 13/12/16 21:40, Raphaël Halimi wrote: > Le 13/12/2016 à 21:36, Daniel Pocock a écrit : >> Do you think you could investigate a little bit more and add >> details to the bug, maybe have a look in Fedora's repositories to >> see if they have a way to do that or ask on debian-devel? > > I'm not

Bug#847681: packaging repository and sid diverging? Various fixes needed.

Le 13/12/2016 à 21:36, Daniel Pocock a écrit : > Do you think you could investigate a little bit more and add details > to the bug, maybe have a look in Fedora's repositories to see if they > have a way to do that or ask on debian-devel? I'm not sure I'm the right person for this job, I don't

Bug#847681: packaging repository and sid diverging? Various fixes needed.

On 13/12/16 21:21, Raphaël Halimi wrote: > Hi guys, > > Sorry to intrude but, since you all seem eager to revive nfs > packages (which I'm very happy about), could you please take a look > at #539201 and include my patch ? It would allow to close both this > bug and #738063, which are both

Bug#847681: packaging repository and sid diverging? Various fixes needed.

Hi guys, Sorry to intrude but, since you all seem eager to revive nfs packages (which I'm very happy about), could you please take a look at #539201 and include my patch ? It would allow to close both this bug and #738063, which are both quite old. (disclaimer : I don't know yet how to do the

Bug#847681: packaging repository and sid diverging? Various fixes needed.

On 12/12/16 21:05, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 11:13 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 10:23:49AM +0100, Ferenc Wágner wrote: > Daniel Pocock writes: >>> Could either of you comment on this bug? I saw your names

Bug#847681: packaging repository and sid diverging? Various fixes needed.

On Mon, 2016-12-12 at 11:13 +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 10:23:49AM +0100, Ferenc Wágner wrote: > > > > Daniel Pocock writes: > > > > > Could either of you comment on this bug?  I saw your names in the > > > nfs-utils changelog.  I've

Bug#847681: packaging repository and sid diverging? Various fixes needed.

Daniel Pocock writes: > On 12/12/16 10:23, Ferenc Wágner wrote: > >> However, I also encountered serious problems deploying NFS (both client >> and server side) under jessie, and I would agree to team up and help do >> better for stretch. > > Can you tell us if all the

Bug#847681: packaging repository and sid diverging? Various fixes needed.

Hi, On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 10:23:49AM +0100, Ferenc Wágner wrote: > Daniel Pocock writes: > > > Could either of you comment on this bug? I saw your names in the > > nfs-utils changelog. I've seen various problems with NFS under jessie > > and I was hoping to help test if

Bug#847681: packaging repository and sid diverging? Various fixes needed.

On 12/12/16 10:23, Ferenc Wágner wrote: > Daniel Pocock writes: > >> Could either of you comment on this bug? I saw your names in the >> nfs-utils changelog. I've seen various problems with NFS under jessie >> and I was hoping to help test if for stretch. > > Hi Daniel, >

Bug#847681: packaging repository and sid diverging? Various fixes needed.

Daniel Pocock writes: > Could either of you comment on this bug? I saw your names in the > nfs-utils changelog. I've seen various problems with NFS under jessie > and I was hoping to help test if for stretch. Hi Daniel, I'm not involved in the maintenance of nfs-utils,

Bug#847681: packaging repository and sid diverging? Various fixes needed.

Hi Salvatore, Ferenc, Could either of you comment on this bug? I saw your names in the nfs-utils changelog. I've seen various problems with NFS under jessie and I was hoping to help test if for stretch. https://bugs.debian.org/847681 Regards, Daniel

Bug#847681: packaging repository and sid diverging? Various fixes needed.

On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 04:35:46PM +0100, Daniel Pocock wrote: [...] > I notice that Andreas made uploads to unstable in June and August 2016: > > http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/n/nfs-utils/unstable_changelog > > while other developers have made unrelated changes in the

Bug#847681: packaging repository and sid diverging? Various fixes needed.

Package: nfs-utils Version: 1:1.2.8-9.2 Severity: important X-Debbugs-CC: andr...@fatal.se I notice that Andreas made uploads to unstable in June and August 2016: http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/n/nfs-utils/unstable_changelog while other developers have made unrelated