On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 06:57:49PM +0100, Stephan Sürken wrote:
> What was the status of the package that delivered the log page with the
> retry button? I.e., INSTALLED or FAILED, and if FAILED, what was the
> error message?
I don't remember. Unless the logs can give this information, we're out
On Do, 2016-12-29 at 18:36 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 06:09:25PM +0100, Stephan Sürken wrote:
> >
> > Could it be you are running with reprepro < 5? (#843402)
> No, I pulled the version from experimental.
I am out of guesses, then ;).
Fwiw, I have just retestet locally
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 06:09:25PM +0100, Stephan Sürken wrote:
> Could it be you are running with reprepro < 5? (#843402)
No, I pulled the version from experimental.
Greetings
Marc
--
-
Marc Haber | "I don't
Hi,
On Do, 2016-12-29 at 17:24 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
(...)
> > > packages being built correctly with the armhf build failing.
> > with armhf being set up as optional arch?
> Probably not. It is not really optional, I didn't notice that armhf
> was offline.
it rather should be; else
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 02:41:40PM +0100, Stephan Sürken wrote:
> On Mi, 2016-12-28 at 13:35 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> (...)
> > When I uploaded a package to mini-buildd, I didn't notice that my
> > armhf builder was being offline. This resulted in the i386 and amd64
> > packages being built
Hi Marc,
On Mi, 2016-12-28 at 13:35 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
(...)
> When I uploaded a package to mini-buildd, I didn't notice that my
> armhf builder was being offline. This resulted in the i386 and amd64
> packages being built correctly with the armhf build failing.
with armhf being set up as
Package: mini-buildd
Version: 1.0.27
Severity: normal
Dear maintainer,
When I uploaded a package to mini-buildd, I didn't notice that my
armhf builder was being offline. This resulted in the i386 and amd64
packages being built correctly with the armhf build failing.
After reparing the armhf
7 matches
Mail list logo
