Bug#849918: RFS: tinymux/2.10.1.13-1

2017-01-05 Thread Stephen Dennis
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 12:32 AM, Tobias Frost wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > BTW, you're using the tar.gz .. Can you use the tar.bz2 for the > packaging as it compresses better? This is also the one that is picked > up by uscan... (Just use uscan --force-download to get

Bug#849918: RFS: tinymux/2.10.1.13-1

2017-01-04 Thread Tobias Frost
Control: tags -1 moreinfo Am Mittwoch, den 04.01.2017, 20:15 -0700 schrieb Stephen Dennis: > Thanks for the starting point. I had worked out the d/watch file > enough > that it works locally (mentors.debian.net still complains), but I > like your > wildcards better, so I'm using that one

Bug#849918: RFS: tinymux/2.10.1.13-1

2017-01-04 Thread Stephen Dennis
Thanks for the starting point. I had worked out the d/watch file enough that it works locally (mentors.debian.net still complains), but I like your wildcards better, so I'm using that one (mentors.debian.net still complains). The simple short d/rules is very much appreciated. I only just begin to

Bug#849918: RFS: tinymux/2.10.1.13-1

2017-01-04 Thread Tobias Frost
Am Donnerstag, den 05.01.2017, 00:24 +0100 schrieb Tobias Frost: > > I wrote you a rule file as starting point. Attached. It is thought to > get you started.  > (Some parts are missing, like the hardening; also stuff and you need > to > do outside of the rules, like to create the file d/clean

Bug#849918: RFS: tinymux/2.10.1.13-1

2017-01-04 Thread Tobias Frost
Am Mittwoch, den 04.01.2017, 13:06 -0700 schrieb Stephen Dennis: > I've never been able to get the watch file to work right, and it is > mis-behaving like it always has. Admitted watchfiles are not easy :) And your directory layout makes it even more difficult... However, you can use this as

Bug#849918: RFS: tinymux/2.10.1.13-1

2017-01-04 Thread Stephen Dennis
I've never been able to get the watch file to work right, and it is mis-behaving like it always has. I think I've made all the other changes requested except I'm still a total loss as to how to migrate to the short debhelper format. On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 7:28 AM, Tobias Frost

Bug#849918: RFS: tinymux/2.10.1.13-1

2017-01-03 Thread Tobias Frost
> Very much appreciate the feedback. Willing to learn, but overwhelmed by the > Debian machinery. You're welcome! Yes, indeed it can be overwhelming. But don't worry, we've all had to learn this ;-) > Stupid question at the top: If I dput another package, does it update this > one or do I need

Bug#849918: RFS: tinymux/2.10.1.13-1

2017-01-02 Thread Stephen Dennis
Very much appreciate the feedback. Willing to learn, but overwhelmed by the Debian machinery. Stupid question at the top: If I dput another package, does it update this one or do I need to delete the currently uploaded package from mentors first? - d/changelog. A lot has changed. Here are

Bug#849918: RFS: tinymux/2.10.1.13-1

2017-01-02 Thread Tobias Frost
control: tags -1 moreinfo Hallo Stephen, (not taking ownership of the bug as I cannot guarantee to find time for follow ups. Other DDs are welcome to take this bug) Many thanks for your intention to adopt your pacakge. I see that you're also upstream of it; this means that I can also request

Bug#849918: RFS: tinymux/2.10.1.13-1

2017-01-02 Thread Stephen Dennis
Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tinymux". I am the upstream maintainer, and there is already an ITA from me against the package. * Package name: tinymux Version : 2.10.1.13-1 Upstream Author : Stephen Dennis