Am 04.01.2017 um 18:30 schrieb Paride Legovini:
> Definitely a good point, this shouldn't happen. I guess that
> distributing timesyncd in a different package (systemd-timesyncd, like
> systemd-cron) is not worth the effort...
Yeah, we do not want or intend to split timesyncd into a separate
Am 04.01.2017 um 18:30 schrieb Paride Legovini:
> On 2017-01-04 18:01, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
>> I also notice that ntp itself does not itself have a provides
>> time-daemon, only chrony and openntpd do.
>>
>> Those do have Conflicts/Replaces/Provides: time-daemon
>>
>> So, by adding Provides:
On 2017-01-04 18:01, Michael Biebl wrote:
> I also notice that ntp itself does not itself have a provides
> time-daemon, only chrony and openntpd do.
>
> Those do have Conflicts/Replaces/Provides: time-daemon
>
> So, by adding Provides: time-daemon, it would make those packages
> uninstallable
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Am 04.01.2017 um 17:16 schrieb Paride Legovini:
> Package: systemd
> Version: 232-8
> Severity: minor
>
> Dear Maintainers,
>
> As systemd now comes with systemd-timesyncd, this package should
> Provide: time-daemon, so packages depending on this virtual package
>
Package: systemd
Version: 232-8
Severity: minor
Dear Maintainers,
As systemd now comes with systemd-timesyncd, this package should
Provide: time-daemon, so packages depending on this virtual package
will have this dependency fulfilled without installing ntp.
Paride
5 matches
Mail list logo
