Control: tag -1 -moreinfo
Hi Sean,
I think you forgot to `git push` :)
Oops! Done.
Also, it would be good if you could use the Forwarded: header to
indicate whether your patches have been sent upstream or not. This is
especially useful in team-maintained packages. If you add this now,
d
control: tag -1 +moreinfo
Hello Carl,
I think you forgot to `git push` :)
Also, it would be good if you could use the Forwarded: header to
indicate whether your patches have been sent upstream or not. This is
especially useful in team-maintained packages. If you add this now,
don't forget `dch
Hi Gianfranco,
Thanks for your comments!
what about calling 2to3 in setup.py?
I somehow overlooked that this was possible. That's much more sensible than what
I was doing.
and you can patch the code with a retro-compatible code
if you can't find a way that works with both python2 and 3,
Hello,
>-export PYBUILD_AFTER_BUILD_python3=2to3 -n -w {build_dir}/pynzb/; sed -i -e
>'s/StringIO/BytesIO/g' -e 's/BytesIO(xml)/BytesIO(bytes(xml,"utf-8"))/'
>{build_dir}/pynzb/lxml_nzb.py
>+export PYBUILD_AFTER_BUILD_python3=2to3-{version} -n -w {build_dir}/pynzb/;
>sed
>-i -e 's/StringIO/B
Control: tag -1 -moreinfo
Hi Sean,
Sorry about that. At your prompting I've installed sbuild and now the package
builds successfully in a chroot for unstable using sbuild -A.
I've uploaded a new version to git and mentors, with the diff below since the
version you last saw. As you can see I
control: tag -1 +moreinfo
control: owner -1 !
Dear Carl,
Before we go any further with this one, I regret to inform you that it
fails to build. See the attached log.
--
Sean Whitton
sbuild (Debian sbuild) 0.72.0 (25 Oct 2016) on iris.silentflame.com
+==
Control: tag -1 -moreinfo
Hi Sean,
Thanks for your review!
The Python 2 module can still be built fine, but I removed it since
there were no rdeps.
As in my reponse to your other RFS, I'd like to confirm that this is
DPMT policy.
I don't think that it's a team policy specifically, I was
control: tag -1 +moreinfo
Dear Carl,
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 12:56:51PM +1100, Carl Suster wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-pynzb"
Thank you for your interest!
> The Python 2 module can still be built fine, but I removed it since
> there were no rdeps.
As in my repon
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "python-pynzb"
* Package name: python-pynzb
Version : 0.1.0-3
* URL : https://github.com/ericflo/pynzb
* License : BSD-3-clause
Section : python
I a
9 matches
Mail list logo
