Bug#850895: bacula: Please migrate to openssl1.1 in buster

Sebastian Andrzej Siewior writes: > On 2017-11-10 00:48:34 [+0100], Carsten Leonhardt wrote: >> Sebastian Andrzej Siewior writes: >> adding that patch on top of the others I get the following error when >> trying to compile: >> >> Compiling

Bug#850895: bacula: Please migrate to openssl1.1 in buster

On 2017-11-10 00:48:34 [+0100], Carsten Leonhardt wrote: > Sebastian Andrzej Siewior writes: > Hi, Hi, > > oh boy. Yes, definitely. Something like that in the attached patch? > > (this time not even compile tested). > > adding that patch on top of the others I get the

Bug#850895: bacula: Please migrate to openssl1.1 in buster

Sebastian Andrzej Siewior writes: Hi, > oh boy. Yes, definitely. Something like that in the attached patch? > (this time not even compile tested). adding that patch on top of the others I get the following error when trying to compile: Compiling openssl.c openssl.c:

Bug#850895: bacula: Please migrate to openssl1.1 in buster

On 2017-11-09 16:53:15 [+], Martin Simmons wrote: > Hi Sebastian, Hi Martin, > Maybe openssl_init_threads and openssl_cleanup_threads (and helper functions) > in src/lib/openssl.c should also be conditionalized to remove uses of the old > threading and locking APIs? oh boy. Yes, definitely.

Bug#850895: bacula: Please migrate to openssl1.1 in buster

Hi Sebastian, Maybe openssl_init_threads and openssl_cleanup_threads (and helper functions) in src/lib/openssl.c should also be conditionalized to remove uses of the old threading and locking APIs? __Martin

Bug#850895: bacula: Please migrate to openssl1.1 in buster

Hi Sebastian, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior writes: > please find attached a few patches :) I can compile against 1.0.2 and > 1.1 with them applied. Please do some testing. There is no testsuite so… first a big thanks! I'll give it some testing and will point upstream to

Bug#850895: bacula: Please migrate to openssl1.1 in buster

On 2017-10-13 21:25:01 [+0200], Carsten Leonhardt wrote: > Hi Sebastian, Hi Carsten, > I've checked all three distros, Fedora and Arch use OpenSSL 1.0 to build > bacula. For Gentoo I'm not sure I can parse the ebuild-files correctly, > but I think they use LibreSSL - in any case there's no patch

Bug#850895: [pkg-bacula-devel] Bug#850895: Bug#850895: bacula: Please migrate to openssl1.1 in buster

Hi Sebastian, > Arch, Fedora and Gentoo provide OpenSSL 1.1. They are also stucked with > 1.0 as compatibility layer. > >> Lastly, the bug is tagged "help" for quite some time already, but help >> doesn't seem to be forthcoming. > > Could please check if one of the three distos I mentioned has

Bug#850895: [pkg-bacula-devel] Bug#850895: bacula: Please migrate to openssl1.1 in buster

On 2017-10-13 08:56:06 [+0200], Carsten Leonhardt wrote: > Hi Sebastian, Hi Carsten, > Upstream does not see a pressing need because OpenSSL version 1.0.2 is > supported until 2019-12-31 - significantly longer than 1.0.2. and then do the port on new years eve :) > Are there any other

Bug#850895: [pkg-bacula-devel] Bug#850895: bacula: Please migrate to openssl1.1 in buster

Hi Sebastian, > this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to > remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity > of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens. I'm not sure what my reaction should be. I myself will not

Bug#850895: bacula: Please migrate to openssl1.1 in buster

Hi, this is a remainder about the openssl transition [0]. We really want to remove libssl1.0-dev from unstable for Buster. I will raise the severity of this bug to serious in a month. Please react before that happens. [0] https://bugs.debian.org/871056#55 Sebastian