Bug#850921: openjfx version for openjdk 9.0

2018-10-03 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Hi Rudy, Le 29/09/2018 à 21:04, Rudy Godoy a écrit : > I've been reading the latest on this matter and learned that Gradle's > migration > is a stopper for this. > I was working on packaging 11+26 few hours ago for a project I'm wokrking on > and realised that eventually progress will be stoped

Bug#850921: openjfx version for openjdk 9.0

2018-09-29 Thread Rudy Godoy
Package: openjfx Version: 8u171-b11-2+b1 Followup-For: Bug #850921 Hello, I've been reading the latest on this matter and learned that Gradle's migration is a stopper for this. I was working on packaging 11+26 few hours ago for a project I'm wokrking on and realised that eventually progress will

Bug#850921: openjfx version for openjdk 9.0

2017-01-19 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 19/01/2017 à 18:49, shirish शिरीष a écrit : > Look forward to knowing your plans. Hi Shirish, As I said last week, I plan to upgrade the openjfx package after the Stretch release, once the OpenJDK 9 transition starts. But if someone else (you?) wants to work on this update sooner I'll be happ

Bug#850921: openjfx version for openjdk 9.0

2017-01-19 Thread shirish शिरीष
in-line :- On 20/01/2017, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 19/01/2017 à 18:49, shirish शिरीष a écrit : > >> Look forward to knowing your plans. > > Hi Shirish, Hi Emmanuel, > As I said last week, I plan to upgrade the openjfx package after the > Stretch release, once the OpenJDK 9 transition starts.

Bug#850921: openjfx version for openjdk 9.0

2017-01-19 Thread shirish शिरीष
at bottom :- On 11/01/2017, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 11/01/2017 à 11:34, shirish शिरीष a écrit : > >> I would suggest to have a new package so people who are on java 8 >> aren't disturbed. While people who want to test out the java 9 and >> openjfx 9 can look at that direction. >> >> As we woul

Bug#850921: openjfx version for openjdk 9.0

2017-01-11 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 11/01/2017 à 11:34, shirish शिरीष a écrit : > I would suggest to have a new package so people who are on java 8 > aren't disturbed. While people who want to test out the java 9 and > openjfx 9 can look at that direction. > > As we would be hitting full-freeze tonight, if you do go that way, >

Bug#850921: openjfx version for openjdk 9.0

2017-01-11 Thread shirish शिरीष
at bottom :- On 11/01/2017, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 11/01/2017 à 09:51, shirish शिरीष a écrit : > >> Looking forward to see the package which works with version 9. >> >> While openjdk 9 would be available around the middle of the year from >> http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk9/ >> >> If ope

Bug#850921: openjfx version for openjdk 9.0

2017-01-11 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 11/01/2017 à 09:51, shirish शिरीष a écrit : > Looking forward to see the package which works with version 9. > > While openjdk 9 would be available around the middle of the year from > http://openjdk.java.net/projects/jdk9/ > > If openjdk 9 is being provided in sid to test out things, it make

Bug#850921: openjfx version for openjdk 9.0

2017-01-11 Thread shirish शिरीष
Package: openjfx Version: 8u111-b14-1 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, openjfx stamps out at 8u111-b14-1 > aptitude show openjfx Package: openjfx Version: 8u111-b14-1 State: installed Automatically installed: no Priority: optional Section: java Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers Architectur