Bug#852199: /snap is a FHS violation

2019-03-11 Thread Nye Liu
How is it possible that in 2018, paths like this are hardcoded and aren’t even configurable at *compile* time? On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 08:09:52 -0500 Jeremy Bicha wrote: > Control: severity -1 normal > Control: tags -1 wontfix > > I'm lowering the severity back to its original level. > > This

Bug#852199: /snap is a FHS violation

2019-01-14 Thread Jeremy Bicha
Control: severity -1 normal Control: tags -1 wontfix I'm lowering the severity back to its original level. This isn't something that's practical to change in Debian so I'm adding wontfix. Thanks, Jeremy Bicha

Bug#852199: /snap is a FHS violation

2017-01-22 Thread Joey Hess
Package: snapd Version: 2.21-1 Severity: normal I am very surprised to see a Debian package violating the FHS so egrariously. -- System Information: Debian Release: 9.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)