¡Hola Laurent!
El 2017-03-11 a las 22:15 +0100, Laurent Bonnaud escribió:
On 11/03/2017 09:49, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
The first iteration is:
https://freak.gnuservers.com.ar/~maxy/debian/sddm_regression_853843/sddm_0.14.0~39-1_amd64.deb
Thanks for this new build! This one works.
After
On 11/03/2017 09:49, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> The first iteration is:
> https://freak.gnuservers.com.ar/~maxy/debian/sddm_regression_853843/sddm_0.14.0~39-1_amd64.deb
Thanks for this new build! This one works.
--
Laurent.
¡Hola Laurent!
El 2017-03-10 a las 21:24 +0100, Laurent Bonnaud escribió:
On 10/03/2017 11:54, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
If this works, the next step would be to do a bisect of the upstream
changes. They aren't that many, but it would be really helpful if
you are able to do the bisect yourself
On 10/03/2017 11:54, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> I'm quite puzzled by this bug, and I would like to have this
> regression fixed for stretch now that 0.14.0-2 is there. The bug is
> also reported upstream, but it's mostly inactive.
Thanks for finding this upstream bug! I subscribed to it.
> Sinc
Control: tag -1 + upstream
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/sddm/sddm/issues/715
¡Hola Laurent!
El 2017-02-27 a las 20:11 +0100, Laurent Bonnaud escribió:
On 27/02/2017 12:04, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
This was reported against the version of sddm that was present in
experimental at t
On 27/02/2017 12:04, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> This was reported against the version of sddm that was present in
> experimental at the time. Using sddm 0.13.0-1 in the same system
> works as expected (if you haven't tested this before you might need
> to use snapshots.debian.org to fetch it)?
I
On 27/02/2017 13:52, Laurent Bonnaud wrote:
> If you need more details, tell me and I will power on this test
> system to get an Xorg server log...
Here it is...
--
Laurent.
[24.737] (--) Log file renamed from "/var/log/Xorg.pid-633.log" to "/var/log/Xorg.0.log"
[24.748]
X.Org X Server
On 27/02/2017 12:00, Maximiliano Curia wrote:
> What kind of test system is this? A vm (which?), a real machine?
A real machine.
> What video card is being used?
A Radeon HD 4850.
> Is the display connected via HDMI?
Yes it is.
> Which video driver is being used?
The default one, probabl
¡Hola Laurent!
El 2017-02-01 a las 13:17 +0100, Laurent Bonnaud escribió:
Package: sddm
Version: 0.14.0-1
Severity: important
Sorry, I forgot to ask. This was reported against the version of sddm that was
present in experimental at the time. Using sddm 0.13.0-1 in the same system works as
e
Control: tag -1 + moreinfo
¡Hola Laurent!
El 2017-02-01 a las 13:17 +0100, Laurent Bonnaud escribió:
Package: sddm
Version: 0.14.0-1
Severity: important
when I boot this test system, sddm starts, does start the X server, but the
screen remains black. The X server works as expect when laun
Package: sddm
Version: 0.14.0-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
when I boot this test system, sddm starts, does start the X server, but the
screen remains black. The X server works as expect when launched by other
means.
Here are relevant processes:
root 633 0.0 0.6 193504 1347
11 matches
Mail list logo
