> On Sat, 18 Feb 2017 22:38:53 +0100, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> said:
> Replacing aufs with overlayfs is currently *not* possible as overlayfs
> still doesn't support NFS as a lowerdir [1]. Thus, trying to create a
As far as I read [1] it's not
Hi Thomas!
> I thought aufs was replaced by overlayfs. But you are right, there's
> still aufs in the dkms package.
Replacing aufs with overlayfs is currently *not* possible as overlayfs
still doesn't support NFS as a lowerdir [1]. Thus, trying to create a
union mount with a read-only NFS
Hey,
I have packaged the module some time ago since overlayfs has still
problems with NFS-roots[1] which is as far as I know bad for e.g. FAI.
Best regards,
Jan
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=832451#15
Am 17.02.2017 um 11:52 schrieb Thomas Lange:
> > I forgot to note
> I forgot to note that the aufs-module can be found in the package
> aufs-dkms (source: aufs) in Debian stretch+.
I thought aufs was replaced by overlayfs. But you are right, there's
still aufs in the dkms package.
--
regards Thomas
On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 09:46:26 +0100 Jan Luca Naumann
wrote:
> At the moment the module-setup.sh script of the aufs-module included in the
> Debian package do not check if there is an aufs module installed in the
> DKMS path.
>
> The attached patch adds the feature that the
Package: dracut-core
Version: 044+241-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
At the moment the module-setup.sh script of the aufs-module included in the
Debian package do not check if there is an aufs module installed in the
DKMS path.
The attached patch adds the feature that the check() function of
6 matches
Mail list logo