On Tue 2017-02-21 10:47:25 -0500, Frans Spiesschaert wrote:
> You may try filing a bug report against the pseudo-package debian-i18n
> and/or sending an email to debian-i...@lists.debian.org.
Looks like the problem that caused #855475 is already reported as bugs
#748716, #750810, #751685,
Daniel Kahn Gillmor schreef op di 21-02-2017 om 09:57 [-0500]:
> On Tue 2017-02-21 04:27:26 -0500, Frans Spiesschaert wrote:
> > Just to clarify a bit: I rely on
> > https://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po-debconf/nl to find out what
> > packages need some attention as far as it comes to
On Tue 2017-02-21 04:27:26 -0500, Frans Spiesschaert wrote:
> Just to clarify a bit: I rely on
> https://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po-debconf/nl to find out what
> packages need some attention as far as it comes to translation of
> debconf massages.
> This page (and the equivalent pages
Hi Daniel,
Daniel Kahn Gillmor schreef op ma 20-02-2017 om 16:02 [-0500]:
> Hi Frans--
>
> I'm a bit confused -- the version of libreswan in debian unstable
> actually has no debconf questions. Upstream has a (stale, old) debian/
> directory that they ship, which does have a bunch of debconf
Hi Frans--
On Sat 2017-02-18 15:36:31 -0500, Frans Spiesschaert wrote:
> Please find attached the updated Dutch translation of libreswan debconf
> messages.
> It has been submitted for review to the debian-l10n-dutch mailing list.
> Please add it to your next package revision.
> It should be
Package: libreswan
Severity: wishlist
Tags: l10n patch
Dear Maintainer,
==
Please find attached the updated Dutch translation of libreswan debconf
messages.
It has been submitted for review to the
6 matches
Mail list logo
