Bug#856042: gnat: please use SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH for reproducible ALI timestamps

2017-03-04 Thread Matthias Klose
On 04.03.2017 17:31, Nicolas Boulenguez wrote: > Package: gnat-7 > Followup-For: Bug #856042 > > Thank you for applying the patch. > The test script passes (with "V=v;export V;c" instead of "V=v c"). does it make sense to backport it to gcc-6=?

Bug#856042: gnat: please use SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH for reproducible ALI timestamps

2017-03-04 Thread Nicolas Boulenguez
Package: gnat-7 Followup-For: Bug #856042 Thank you for applying the patch. The test script passes (with "V=v;export V;c" instead of "V=v c").

Bug#856042: gnat: please use SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH for reproducible ALI timestamps

2017-02-28 Thread Nicolas Boulenguez
Package: gnat-7 Followup-For: Bug #856042 Control: tags 856042 + patch This new source-date-epoch.diff applies to 7-20170226-1 and builds with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="lang=ada nocheck noopt nostrap nolang=...". The test is more extensive, but I have not been able to run it on the build result (for

Bug#856042: gnat: please use SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH for reproducible ALI timestamps

2017-02-24 Thread Nicolas Boulenguez
Package: gnat-7 Severity: wishlist Hello. Please ignore file mtimes greater than SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH when generating timestamps into ALI files. This would help reproducible builds of many Ada packages patching or generating Ada sources. A first patch/test attempt is attached, but I am unable to