based on the discussion in this bug, and
https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/blob/master/src/views/view.c#L328-L332
I'm currently leaning towards dropping i386 binaries for stretch.
On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 1:07 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 04:25:18PM +0300, Roman Lebedev wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> > Source: darktable
>> > Version: 2.2.1-2
>> > Severity: serious
>> >
>> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=da
On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 04:25:18PM +0300, Roman Lebedev wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > Source: darktable
> > Version: 2.2.1-2
> > Severity: serious
> >
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=darktable&arch=i386&ver=2.2.1-2&stamp=1483383078&raw=0
> >
> >
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Source: darktable
> Version: 2.2.1-2
> Severity: serious
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=darktable&arch=i386&ver=2.2.1-2&stamp=1483383078&raw=0
>
> ...
> -- Performing Test _MSSE2
> -- Performing Test _MSSE2 - Success
> -- Bui
Adrian Bunk writes:
>
> These are not SSE2 codepaths with autodetection,
> the package seems to be built in a way that it
> won't run on hardware without SSE2.
Did you test the resulting binary? When I tested it (several years ago),
the resulting binary detected lack of sse2 and printed an error
Source: darktable
Version: 2.2.1-2
Severity: serious
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=darktable&arch=i386&ver=2.2.1-2&stamp=1483383078&raw=0
...
-- Performing Test _MSSE2
-- Performing Test _MSSE2 - Success
-- Building SSE2-optimized codepaths: ON
...
[ 4%] Building C object src/ex
6 matches
Mail list logo