Bug#857274: Acknowledgement (unblock: ola/0.10.3.nojsmin-1)

2017-03-17 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 09:30:17AM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > I have aged -1 so that it migrates in the next britney run (in ~1.5h). Please > wait for it to migrate and then go ahead, and file a new unblock request. Will do, thanks. -- < ron> I mean, the main *practical* problem with

Bug#857274: Acknowledgement (unblock: ola/0.10.3.nojsmin-1)

2017-03-17 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 17/03/17 09:05, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > Hi Niels, > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 06:57:00AM +, Niels Thykier wrote: >> Wouter Verhelst: >>> Hi, >>> >>> It looks like this bug didn't reach the list, possibly due to the large >>> attachment that came with it. >>> >>> Since ola is due to be remo

Bug#857274: Acknowledgement (unblock: ola/0.10.3.nojsmin-1)

2017-03-17 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Hi Niels, On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 06:57:00AM +, Niels Thykier wrote: > Wouter Verhelst: > > Hi, > > > > It looks like this bug didn't reach the list, possibly due to the large > > attachment that came with it. > > > > Since ola is due to be removed from testing tomorrow, and since I'd like >

Bug#857274: Acknowledgement (unblock: ola/0.10.3.nojsmin-1)

2017-03-10 Thread Wouter Verhelst
Hi, It looks like this bug didn't reach the list, possibly due to the large attachment that came with it. Since ola is due to be removed from testing tomorrow, and since I'd like to avoid that, I'd like to see at least some form of response ;-) On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 12:12:05PM +, Debian Bu