Bug#857385: jablicator: should it be removed from the archive?

2017-03-23 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 12:10:24PM -0700, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: > If you know who to ask and are willing, I appreciate it. > > Otherwise, I'll figure it out eventually. It's only about opening a bug against ftp.debian.org with the appropriate subject, in this case I'd say RM: jablicator --

Bug#857385: jablicator: should it be removed from the archive?

2017-03-23 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
If you know who to ask and are willing, I appreciate it. Otherwise, I'll figure it out eventually.

Bug#857385: jablicator: should it be removed from the archive?

2017-03-19 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 11:29:01PM -0700, Jeff Breidenbach wrote: > Yes, I concur. I also checked with upstream (myself) and he agrees too. Ok. Would you ask for removal or shall I? -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540

Bug#857385: jablicator: should it be removed from the archive?

2017-03-18 Thread Jeff Breidenbach
Yes, I concur. I also checked with upstream (myself) and he agrees too. On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Source: jablicator > Version: 1.0.1 > Severity: serious > > Dear maintainer, > > The package doesn't seem to have much popularity these days, with a > popcon of only 2

Bug#857385: jablicator: should it be removed from the archive?

2017-03-10 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Source: jablicator Version: 1.0.1 Severity: serious Dear maintainer, The package doesn't seem to have much popularity these days, with a popcon of only 20 (recent: 0). There has been an open RC bug for 1 year, and a patch since January. Also there is another unacknowledged bug since 2006. What