On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 08:57:00PM +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Alexandre Viau:
> >>> That was a bad understanding of the QA page from my part [1]. Actually
> >>> can somebody explain why 1.1.1 is in the "testing" column?
> >> Becuase you didn't fix the build failure of 1.1.1+dfsg1-1 and
> >> 1.1.
Alexandre Viau:
>>> That was a bad understanding of the QA page from my part [1]. Actually
>>> can somebody explain why 1.1.1 is in the "testing" column?
>> Becuase you didn't fix the build failure of 1.1.1+dfsg1-1 and
>> 1.1.1+dfsg1-2 quickly enough, like, in December when they happened, and
>> in
On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 04:17:17PM -0400, Alexandre Viau wrote:
> Hello,
Please don't break the threading like you did with this email.
> I have noticed that 1.1.1 isn't in Debian yet.
It is?
> That was a bad understanding of the QA page from my part [1]. Actually
> can somebody explain why 1.1
Hello,
I have noticed that 1.1.1 isn't in Debian yet.
That was a bad understanding of the QA page from my part [1]. Actually
can somebody explain why 1.1.1 is in the "testing" column?
Anyways, can we still get it unblocked? It contains various fixes that
would be a great addition for Stretch.
I
4 matches
Mail list logo