Quoting Vasudev Kamath (2017-04-22 18:08:27)
> James Clarke writes:
>
> > Control: tags -1 patch
> >
> > These symbol files differences have been fixed by Ubuntu. I came to
> > an identical patch independently before being told about it. I have
> > also performed some additional cleanup where t
James Clarke writes:
> Control: tags -1 patch
>
> These symbol files differences have been fixed by Ubuntu. I came to an
> identical patch independently before being told about it. I have also
> performed some additional cleanup where things are clearly based on
> bitness or endianness, which are
> On 20 Apr 2017, at 14:52, James Clarke wrote:
> I have checked the build (no symbol diff, even warnings) on amd64 and
> i386. I will continue to test other architectures and update this bug
> later today.
Attached is an updated patch.
I have done porterbox test builds for the following archite
Control: tags -1 patch
These symbol files differences have been fixed by Ubuntu. I came to an
identical patch independently before being told about it. I have also
performed some additional cleanup where things are clearly based on
bitness or endianness, which are *not* included in the Ubuntu delt
Source: zimlib
Version: 1.4-2
Severity: serious
Tags: stretch sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20170418-i386 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS in stretch on i386
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in stretch (in a stretch chroot, not a
sid chroot), your package failed to buil
5 matches
Mail list logo
