Bug#861789: Please provide database.target as a synchronization point for applications providing databases and needing databases

2020-03-19 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Michael Biebl 2020-03-18 <27361fa3-c814-8787-6e10-c5d13956a...@debian.org> > My concerns are still the same as I outlined above, so I think such a > database.target would not be too useful given it would only be very > vaguely defined. Also, we shouldn't invent a snowflake solution in Debian

Bug#861789: Please provide database.target as a synchronization point for applications providing databases and needing databases

2019-09-03 Thread Michael Biebl
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo On Thu, 4 May 2017 17:47:17 +0200 Christian Hofstaedtler wrote: > How will a database.target solve anything in those not so uncommon > setups: > > - database is remote > > or > > - one database needs another to start? > > Please consider: if you end up with a

Bug#861789: Please provide database.target as a synchronization point for applications providing databases and needing databases

2017-05-04 Thread Christian Hofstaedtler
How will a database.target solve anything in those not so uncommon setups: - database is remote or - one database needs another to start? Please consider: if you end up with a solution that only works for 90% of installations - fails on 10% - is that actually solving your problem? C.