Bug#862258: add an user for mlmmj

2017-05-30 Thread Geert Stappers
Control: reopen -1 Stop Ticket reopened so the BTS accepts further updates.

Bug#862258: add an user for mlmmj

2017-05-29 Thread Geert Stappers
On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 09:49:49PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 05/27/2017 01:48 AM, Geert Stappers wrote: > >> On 05/25/2017 10:59 AM, Geert Stappers wrote: > >>> Both http://mlmmj.org/docs/readme-exim4/ and > >>> http://mlmmj.org/docs/readme-postfix/ > >>> say to create a mlmmj user. > >

Bug#862258: [Pkg-mlmmj-devel] Bug#862258: Bug#862258: add an user for mlmmj

2017-05-27 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 05/27/2017 01:48 AM, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 01:43:01PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> On 05/25/2017 10:59 AM, Geert Stappers wrote: >>> On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 04:00:37PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: just leave the choice to the user and let him do it by hand. >>>

Bug#862258: [Pkg-mlmmj-devel] Bug#862258: add an user for mlmmj

2017-05-26 Thread Geert Stappers
On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 01:43:01PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 05/25/2017 10:59 AM, Geert Stappers wrote: > > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 04:00:37PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: > >> just leave the choice to the user and let him do it by hand. > > > > It is the "add an user _by hand_" that I

Bug#862258: [Pkg-mlmmj-devel] Bug#862258: add an user for mlmmj

2017-05-25 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 05/25/2017 10:59 AM, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 04:00:37PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have seen your patches, however, I don't think it is really necessary >> to add a new system user for mlmmj. There are many ways to use MLMMJ, >> one would be without

Bug#862258: add an user for mlmmj

2017-05-25 Thread Geert Stappers
On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 04:00:37PM +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi, > > I have seen your patches, however, I don't think it is really necessary > to add a new system user for mlmmj. There are many ways to use MLMMJ, > one would be without using any system user at all, which is what one > would