On Tue 2017-05-23 00:43:01 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Control: tag -1 + patch moreinfo
>
> Daniel and others who might be affected by that regression: Please
> test the patch at the end of the mail if it suffices to fix your issue
> with regards the API and if it doesn't cause any other
On Sun 2017-05-21 21:03:36 +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Control: forwarded -1 http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?50440
hey, thanks for finding that, Axel!
> Can you check if this is fixed in screen 4.5.1-3 from Debian
> Experimental? Because according to the upstream bug report
>
Control: tag -1 + patch moreinfo
Hi again,
Daniel and others who might be affected by that regression: Please
test the patch at the end of the mail if it suffices to fix your issue
with regards the API and if it doesn't cause any other regressions.
Axel Beckert wrote:
> Axel Beckert wrote:
> >
Control: found -1 4.5.0-1
Control: fixed -1 4.5.1-1
Hi Daniel,
Axel Beckert wrote:
> Control: tag -1 + upstream fixed-upstream confirmed
> > but if you have any pre-existing code that does something like:
> >
> > screen -L -c foo.screenrc
> >
> > then it fails in 4.5.0 because it doesn't
Control: tag -1 + upstream fixed-upstream confirmed
Control: forwarded -1 http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?50440
Control: severity -1 important
Hi Daniel,
thanks for the bug report.
Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> before screen 4.5.0, -L took no arguments.
>
> in 4.5.0 and later, -L takes one
Package: screen
Version: 4.5.0-5
Severity: normal
before screen 4.5.0, -L took no arguments.
in 4.5.0 and later, -L takes one argument, the name of the logfile.
but if you have any pre-existing code that does something like:
screen -L -c foo.screenrc
then it fails in 4.5.0 because it
6 matches
Mail list logo
