Control: tags -1 + pending
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 11:21:28AM +0200, Bernhard Schmidt wrote:
> stretch-pu filed as
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=870604
Accepted into p-u, will be part of Debian 9.2 and should be available
shortly on https://www.debian.org/releases/proposed-
On 18.07.2017 13:26, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> Am 18.07.2017 um 13:05 schrieb Patrick Matthäi:
>>> I've browsed through the git commits between 2.4.0 and 2.4.3, these
>>> might be relevant here
>>>
>>> https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/ticket/812
>>> https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/ticket/
Control: forwarded -1 https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/ticket/812
> I have tested it three times, it is definitly
> https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/ticket/812 which fixes this issue
Thanks, I'll fix it ASAP.
Bernhard
Am 18.07.2017 um 13:29 schrieb Bernhard Schmidt:
I've browsed through the git commits between 2.4.0 and 2.4.3, these
might be relevant here
https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/ticket/812
https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/ticket/887
Are you able to build a ve
Am 18.07.2017 um 13:05 schrieb Patrick Matthäi:
>> I've browsed through the git commits between 2.4.0 and 2.4.3, these
>> might be relevant here
>>
>> https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/ticket/812
>> https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/ticket/887
>>
>> Are you able to build a version with thes
Am 18.07.2017 um 13:26 schrieb Patrick Matthäi:
Hi,
> Am 18.07.2017 um 13:05 schrieb Patrick Matthäi:
>>> I've browsed through the git commits between 2.4.0 and 2.4.3, these
>>> might be relevant here
>>>
>>> https://community.openvpn.net/openvpn/ticket/812
>>> https://community.openvpn.net/openv
Am 18.07.2017 um 12:58 schrieb Bernhard Schmidt:
> The notworking version does nothing like this. This smells like a bug.
>
> What I don't understand is that you claim the VPN endpoint is not
> reachable on the dead nodes (the outer IP I presume). Both nodes still
> have a hostroute towards the VPN
Control: fixed -1 2.4.3-4
Am 18.07.2017 um 10:44 schrieb Patrick Matthäi:
Hi,
thanks for the logs!
> we have got the same issue with all our VPNs upgraded to Stretch now.
> Most VPNs are connected about a 1 GBit/s datacenter connection with each
> other (also same LAN), the other on
Am 12.07.2017 um 16:17 schrieb Bernhard Schmidt:
> Am 12.07.2017 um 15:41 schrieb Patrick Matthäi:
>
> Hi,
>
we have got the same issue with all our VPNs upgraded to Stretch now.
Most VPNs are connected about a 1 GBit/s datacenter connection with each
other (also same LAN), the other
Hi,
> I also uploaded the current testing version to stretch-bpo and deployed
> it on one host, to see if there is a difference later
BTW, right now the version from Buster (2.4.3-4) is installable on
Stretch just fine, so no need for an official backport if you are doing
a short test.
Bernhard
Am 12.07.2017 um 15:41 schrieb Patrick Matthäi:
Hi,
>>> we have got the same issue with all our VPNs upgraded to Stretch now.
>>> Most VPNs are connected about a 1 GBit/s datacenter connection with each
>>> other (also same LAN), the other ones are connected about a 100 MBit/s
>>> connection.
>>
Am 12.07.2017 um 12:10 schrieb Bernhard Schmidt:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 09:35:53AM +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> we have got the same issue with all our VPNs upgraded to Stretch now.
>> Most VPNs are connected about a 1 GBit/s datacenter connection with each
>> other (also same LAN)
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 09:35:53AM +0200, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
Hi,
> we have got the same issue with all our VPNs upgraded to Stretch now.
> Most VPNs are connected about a 1 GBit/s datacenter connection with each
> other (also same LAN), the other ones are connected about a 100 MBit/s
> connec
g#863110: openvpn: VPN remains connected, but network is
unreachable after 30-45 min and requires reconnect
Local Time: May 25, 2017 8:20 PM
UTC Time: May 26, 2017 1:20 AM
From: presc...@hidalgo-monroy.com
To: Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta , 863...@bugs.debian.org
<863...@bugs.debian.org>
It seemed
mtu 1634'
May 25 20:11:51 $hostname nm-openvpn[26356]: WARNING: 'tun-mtu' is used
inconsistently, local='tun-mtu 1500', remote='tun-mtu 1532'
Regards,
Prescott
---- Original Message ----
Subject: Re: Bug#863110: openvpn: VPN remains connected, but network
> The final message is due to the ping I used to test the connection.
>
> Regards,
>
> Prescott
>
> Original Message
> Subject: Re: Bug#863110: openvpn: VPN remains connected, but network is
> unreachable after 30-45 min and requires reconnect
> Loca
_and_recv->nl_recvmsgs failed: -33
The final message is due to the ping I used to test the connection.
Regards,
Prescott
---- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Bug#863110: openvpn: VPN remains connected, but network is
unreachable after 30-45 min and requires reconnect
Local Time:
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 06:40:31PM -0500, Prescott wrote:
> Package: openvpn
> Version: 2.4.0-5
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
>After the upgrade to openvpn 2.4.0-5 (from *-4), an issue has been
>occuring where after having been connected to the VPN for an
>approximate a
Package: openvpn
Version: 2.4.0-5
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
After the upgrade to openvpn 2.4.0-5 (from *-4), an issue has been
occuring where after having been connected to the VPN for an
approximate amount of time of around 30-45 minutes, the network
connection will drop.
19 matches
Mail list logo