On 16/10/17 16:44, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 16.10.2017 um 12:40 schrieb Alan Jenkins:
I suspect this would end up with Debian carrying the patch to the
systemd generator. But all it needs to do is test for
`/var/lib/update-rc.d/${script}.removed` and then skip ${script}.
Alan
I'm not very
Am 16.10.2017 um 12:40 schrieb Alan Jenkins:
> I suspect this would end up with Debian carrying the patch to the
> systemd generator. But all it needs to do is test for
> `/var/lib/update-rc.d/${script}.removed` and then skip ${script}.
>
> Alan
I'm not very enthusiastic of keeping and
On 14/10/17 13:27, Michael Biebl wrote:
On Fri, 4 Aug 2017 22:12:08 +0100 Alan Jenkins
wrote:
Can you please explain how #714903 can be fixed differently so masking
is not needed?
> There were two reasons `mask` was used here.
>
> 1. Removing a package
On Fri, 4 Aug 2017 22:12:08 +0100 Alan Jenkins
wrote:
> On 04/08/17 20:52, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > On Fri, 09 Jun 2017 17:48:59 +0100 Alan Jenkins
> >> There were two reasons `mask` was used here.
> >>
> >> 1. #722521. Removing a package naturally deletes
On 04/08/17 20:52, Michael Biebl wrote:
On Fri, 09 Jun 2017 17:48:59 +0100 Alan Jenkins
There were two reasons `mask` was used here.
1. #722521. Removing a package naturally deletes most of its files, including
deleting the systemd service unit. However the system V init script is
On Fri, 09 Jun 2017 17:48:59 +0100 Alan Jenkins
> There were two reasons `mask` was used here.
>
> 1. #722521. Removing a package naturally deletes most of its files, including
>deleting the systemd service unit. However the system V init script is
>preserved, because it might include
Package: debhelper
Version: 10.4
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
dh_systemd_enable switched from `disable` (on package removal) to `mask` in
2013-09[1].
I noticed[2] each such removed service causes a warning at boot time.
`rsync.service: Cannot add dependency job, ignoring: Unit
7 matches
Mail list logo