Bug#864504: dh_systemd_enable: please go back using `disable` instead of `mask`

2017-10-16 Thread Alan Jenkins
On 16/10/17 16:44, Michael Biebl wrote: Am 16.10.2017 um 12:40 schrieb Alan Jenkins: I suspect this would end up with Debian carrying the patch to the systemd generator.  But all it needs to do is test for `/var/lib/update-rc.d/${script}.removed` and then skip ${script}. Alan I'm not very

Bug#864504: dh_systemd_enable: please go back using `disable` instead of `mask`

2017-10-16 Thread Michael Biebl
Am 16.10.2017 um 12:40 schrieb Alan Jenkins: > I suspect this would end up with Debian carrying the patch to the > systemd generator.  But all it needs to do is test for > `/var/lib/update-rc.d/${script}.removed` and then skip ${script}. > > Alan I'm not very enthusiastic of keeping and

Bug#864504: dh_systemd_enable: please go back using `disable` instead of `mask`

2017-10-16 Thread Alan Jenkins
On 14/10/17 13:27, Michael Biebl wrote: On Fri, 4 Aug 2017 22:12:08 +0100 Alan Jenkins wrote: Can you please explain how #714903 can be fixed differently so masking is not needed? > There were two reasons `mask` was used here. > > 1. Removing a package

Bug#864504: dh_systemd_enable: please go back using `disable` instead of `mask`

2017-10-14 Thread Michael Biebl
On Fri, 4 Aug 2017 22:12:08 +0100 Alan Jenkins wrote: > On 04/08/17 20:52, Michael Biebl wrote: > > On Fri, 09 Jun 2017 17:48:59 +0100 Alan Jenkins > >> There were two reasons `mask` was used here. > >> > >> 1. #722521. Removing a package naturally deletes

Bug#864504: dh_systemd_enable: please go back using `disable` instead of `mask`

2017-08-04 Thread Alan Jenkins
On 04/08/17 20:52, Michael Biebl wrote: On Fri, 09 Jun 2017 17:48:59 +0100 Alan Jenkins There were two reasons `mask` was used here. 1. #722521. Removing a package naturally deletes most of its files, including deleting the systemd service unit. However the system V init script is

Bug#864504: dh_systemd_enable: please go back using `disable` instead of `mask`

2017-08-04 Thread Michael Biebl
On Fri, 09 Jun 2017 17:48:59 +0100 Alan Jenkins > There were two reasons `mask` was used here. > > 1. #722521. Removing a package naturally deletes most of its files, including >deleting the systemd service unit. However the system V init script is >preserved, because it might include

Bug#864504: dh_systemd_enable: please go back using `disable` instead of `mask`

2017-06-09 Thread Alan Jenkins
Package: debhelper Version: 10.4 Severity: wishlist Dear Maintainer, dh_systemd_enable switched from `disable` (on package removal) to `mask` in 2013-09[1]. I noticed[2] each such removed service causes a warning at boot time. `rsync.service: Cannot add dependency job, ignoring: Unit