Bug#864831: [Debian-science-sagemath] NTL update to 10.3.0

2018-01-07 Thread Ximin Luo
Ximin Luo: > Ximin Luo: >> Julien Puydt: >>> Le 19/10/2017 à 22:24, Ximin Luo a écrit : >>> I fixed things in git by removing MAKEFLAGS and rewriting d/rules to do the previous stuff in a cleaner way. I've rebuilt all of the reverse dependencies () and they all succeeded including

Bug#864831: [Debian-science-sagemath] NTL update to 10.3.0

2018-01-03 Thread Ximin Luo
Ximin Luo: > Julien Puydt: >> Le 19/10/2017 à 22:24, Ximin Luo a écrit : >> >>> I fixed things in git by removing MAKEFLAGS and rewriting d/rules to do the >>> previous stuff in a cleaner way. I've rebuilt all of the reverse >>> dependencies () and they all succeeded including tests. So I think

Bug#864831: [Debian-science-sagemath] NTL update to 10.3.0

2017-10-19 Thread Ximin Luo
Julien Puydt: > Le 19/10/2017 à 22:24, Ximin Luo a écrit : > >> I fixed things in git by removing MAKEFLAGS and rewriting d/rules to do the >> previous stuff in a cleaner way. I've rebuilt all of the reverse >> dependencies () and they all succeeded including tests. So I think we're >> good to

Bug#864831: [Debian-science-sagemath] NTL update to 10.3.0

2017-10-19 Thread Julien Puydt
Le 19/10/2017 à 22:24, Ximin Luo a écrit : > I fixed things in git by removing MAKEFLAGS and rewriting d/rules to do the > previous stuff in a cleaner way. I've rebuilt all of the reverse dependencies > () and they all succeeded including tests. So I think we're good to go ahead > with the

Bug#864831: [Debian-science-sagemath] NTL update to 10.3.0

2017-10-19 Thread Ximin Luo
Ximin Luo: > [..] > > I fixed things in git by removing MAKEFLAGS and rewriting d/rules to do the > previous stuff in a cleaner way. I've rebuilt all of the reverse dependencies > () and they all succeeded including tests. So I think we're good to go ahead > with the transition, whenever

Bug#864831: [Debian-science-sagemath] NTL update to 10.3.0

2017-10-19 Thread Ximin Luo
Julien Puydt: > > > Le 01/09/2017 à 00:03, Ximin Luo a écrit : >> Thanks for that. I forced the rebuild to continue by skipping the flint >> tests with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck sbuild --profiles=nocheck , and am >> pleased to report that singular and pynac built (including tests) >>

Bug#864831: [Debian-science-sagemath] NTL update to 10.3.0

2017-09-01 Thread Julien Puydt
Le 01/09/2017 à 00:03, Ximin Luo a écrit : > Thanks for that. I forced the rebuild to continue by skipping the flint tests > with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck sbuild --profiles=nocheck , and am > pleased to report that singular and pynac built (including tests) > successfully. That is good

Bug#864831: [Debian-science-sagemath] NTL update to 10.3.0

2017-08-31 Thread Ximin Luo
Julien Puydt: > Hi, > >> [..] > > I could reproduce the matter, asked upstream if it was known, and since > it wasn't: > https://github.com/wbhart/flint2/issues/372 > Thanks for that. I forced the rebuild to continue by skipping the flint tests with DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck sbuild

Bug#864831: [Debian-science-sagemath] NTL update to 10.3.0

2017-08-31 Thread Julien Puydt
Hi, Le 31/08/2017 à 14:48, Ximin Luo a écrit : > eclib, giac, linbox succeeded but flint fails: > > [..] > make[3]: Entering directory '/<>' > g++ -g -O2 -fdebug-prefix-map=/<>=. -fstack-protector-strong > -Wformat -Werror=format-security -I/<> -c > interfaces/NTL-interface.cpp -o

Bug#864831: [Debian-science-sagemath] NTL update to 10.3.0

2017-08-31 Thread Ximin Luo
Ximin Luo: > Julien Puydt: >> [..] >> >> I still pushed this work-in-progress, as it should be good enought for >> some tests already. >> > > I will have a go at testing it tomorrow/soon. Thanks! > eclib, giac, linbox succeeded but flint fails: [..] make[3]: Entering directory '/<>' g++ -g

Bug#864831: [Debian-science-sagemath] NTL update to 10.3.0

2017-08-31 Thread Julien Puydt
Hi, Le 31/08/2017 à 00:10, Ximin Luo a écrit : > Julien Puydt: >> Hi, >> >> Le 29/08/2017 à 14:25, Tobias Hansen a écrit : >>> Now is a good time for the NTL transition. Julien, could you update the >>> package to 10.3.0? Then we can test-build the reverse dependencies and >>> ask for a

Bug#864831: [Debian-science-sagemath] NTL update to 10.3.0

2017-08-30 Thread Ximin Luo
Ximin Luo: > Julien Puydt: >> Hi, >> >> Le 29/08/2017 à 14:25, Tobias Hansen a écrit : >>> Now is a good time for the NTL transition. Julien, could you update the >>> package to 10.3.0? Then we can test-build the reverse dependencies and >>> ask for a transition. >> >> Indeed there was a soname

Bug#864831: [Debian-science-sagemath] NTL update to 10.3.0

2017-08-30 Thread Ximin Luo
Julien Puydt: > Hi, > > Le 29/08/2017 à 14:25, Tobias Hansen a écrit : >> Now is a good time for the NTL transition. Julien, could you update the >> package to 10.3.0? Then we can test-build the reverse dependencies and >> ask for a transition. > > Indeed there was a soname version bump from 27

Bug#864831: [Debian-science-sagemath] NTL update to 10.3.0

2017-08-30 Thread Julien Puydt
Hi, Le 29/08/2017 à 14:25, Tobias Hansen a écrit : > Now is a good time for the NTL transition. Julien, could you update the > package to 10.3.0? Then we can test-build the reverse dependencies and > ask for a transition. Uh, latest upstream is 10.5.0, and that's what I'm now working on.

Bug#864831: [Debian-science-sagemath] NTL update to 10.3.0

2017-08-30 Thread Julien Puydt
Hi, Le 29/08/2017 à 14:25, Tobias Hansen a écrit : > Now is a good time for the NTL transition. Julien, could you update the > package to 10.3.0? Then we can test-build the reverse dependencies and > ask for a transition. Indeed there was a soname version bump from 27 to 35, so a transition is