-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello Antoine,
hello Herbert,
many thanks for your work to get the missing packages for rapid-photo-
downloader into Debian.
Antoine I have update the package to the release 0.9.7 and some other
changes.
CU
Jörg
- --
New:
GPG Fingerprint: 63E0
On 2018-01-03 21:58:40, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Hello Antoine,
> hello Herbert,
>
> many thanks for your work to get the missing packages for rapid-photo-
> downloader into Debian.
>
> Antoine I have update the package to the release 0.9.7 an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello Antoine,
Am Mittwoch, den 03.01.2018, 16:15 -0500 schrieb Antoine Beaupré:
> On 2018-01-03 21:58:40, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA512
> >
> > Hello Antoine,
> > hello Herbert,
> >
> > many than
On 2018-01-03 22:26:44, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Hello Antoine,
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 03.01.2018, 16:15 -0500 schrieb Antoine Beaupré:
>> On 2018-01-03 21:58:40, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
>> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> > Hash: SHA512
Em 03-01-2018 18:58, Jörg Frings-Fürst escreveu:
> Hello Antoine,
> hello Herbert,
>
> many thanks for your work to get the missing packages for rapid-photo-
> downloader into Debian.
>
You are welcome.
Regards,
Herbert
Package: rapid-photo-downloader
Version: 0.4.11-1
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
See http://damonlynch.net/rapid/release090.html
The biggest change seems to be availability of -
Files can be downloaded from all cameras supported by gPhoto2,
including smartphones. Unfortunately the previous
block 867527 by 781693
block 867527 by 867799
block 867527 by 867800block 867527 by 867801
block 867527 by 867802
thanks
Hello shirish,
thank you for spending your time helping to make Debian better with this bug
report.
I'm working to get the new release into Debian, but first Debian need
som
Reply in-line :-
On 09/07/2017, Jörg Frings-Fürst wrote:
>
>
> Hello shirish,
Hello Jorg,
> thank you for spending your time helping to make Debian better with this bug
> report.
>
> I'm working to get the new release into Debian, but first Debian need
> some new packages.
>
While I've subscri
Hi,
Damon Lynch, damonly...@gmail.com, sent me an email
asking about python-gphoto2.
I set myself as 'owner' of #781693[0]. It blocks
this bug if I understood right.
[0] - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=781693
I will try to do the Debian package this weekend. If
there is som
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 11:28:47AM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Damon Lynch, damonly...@gmail.com, sent me an email
> asking about python-gphoto2.
>
> I set myself as 'owner' of #781693[0]. It blocks
> this bug if I understood right.
>
> [0] - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport
On 2017-12-16 23:31:44, Antoine Beaupre wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 11:28:47AM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Damon Lynch, damonly...@gmail.com, sent me an email
>> asking about python-gphoto2.
>>
>> I set myself as 'owner' of #781693[0]. It blocks
>> this bug if I understood rig
On 2017-12-16 23:31:44, Antoine Beaupre wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 11:28:47AM -0200, Herbert Fortes wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Damon Lynch, damonly...@gmail.com, sent me an email
>> asking about python-gphoto2.
>>
>> I set myself as 'owner' of #781693[0]. It blocks
>> this bug if I understood rig
> Next step is for me to do a NMU of 0.9.6, which I have a working package
> of here.
So the dependencies are in NEW now, and we're now doing the waiting game
for those packages.
In the meantime, I updated the "feature/upstream" branch with the latest
changes I did to make the package work.
It s
13 matches
Mail list logo