Bug#869547: udev-rule-missing-subsystem false-positive when rules file uses a GOTO

2017-07-23 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Package: lintian Version: 2.5.52 Severity: minor usb-modeswitch-data ships with 40-usb_modeswitch.rules [0] which has 388 rules that all trigger the udev-rule-missing-subsystem lintian warning. Point is, that file has all the matching entries within a SUBSYSTEM/GOTO block (see lines 12 and 1181);

Bug#869547: udev-rule-missing-subsystem false-positive when rules file uses a GOTO

2018-02-05 Thread Didier 'OdyX' Raboud
Le lundi, 5 février 2018, 16.58:46 h CET Chris Lamb a écrit : > Fixed in Git, pending upload Yay, thanks; and sorry for my unresponsiveness. -- OdyX

Bug#869547: udev-rule-missing-subsystem false-positive when rules file uses a GOTO

2018-02-05 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi Didier, > > Fixed in Git, pending upload > > Yay, thanks; and sorry for my unresponsiveness. No problem; it was quite an "expansive" question :) Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `-

Bug#869547: udev-rule-missing-subsystem false-positive when rules file uses a GOTO

2018-01-22 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi Didier, > usb-modeswitch-data ships with 40-usb_modeswitch.rules [0] which has 388 > rules that all trigger the udev-rule-missing-subsystem lintian warning. > Point is, that file has all the matching entries within a SUBSYSTEM/GOTO > block How common are GOTO blocks in .rules files? Regards,