On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Really? There seems to be quite a bit of code that's conditional to
> #ifdev HAVE_VALGRIND, e.g. in intel/intel_bufmgr_gem.c, and I don't
> think building with the nocheck profile should alter the produced binary
> packages.
Hmm, I guess if
On 2017-07-30 12:17 -0700, Daniel Schepler wrote:
> Source: libdrm
> Version: 2.4.82-1
> Severity: wishlist
>
> Currently, libdrm is involved in build dependency cycles such as:
>
> libdrm Build-Depends on valgrind
> valgrind Build-Depends on gdb
> gdb Build-Depends on texlive-base
> texlive-base
Source: libdrm
Version: 2.4.82-1
Severity: wishlist
Currently, libdrm is involved in build dependency cycles such as:
libdrm Build-Depends on valgrind
valgrind Build-Depends on gdb
gdb Build-Depends on texlive-base
texlive-base Depends on texlive-binaries
texlive-bin Build-Depends on libgd-dev
li
3 matches
Mail list logo