Bug#870273: imagemagick: regression in 8:6.8.9.9-5+deb8u10

2019-12-28 Thread Hugo Lefeuvre
> Looks like I found the issue: > > 0224-Ensure-token-does-not-overflow.patch corresponds to [0]. This patch > was meant for ImageMagick 7.x, not 6.x. The correct patch is [1] (the one > used in stretch). > > This will be fixed in the next security update. Not completely true. After spending

Bug#870273: imagemagick: regression in 8:6.8.9.9-5+deb8u10

2019-12-27 Thread Hugo Lefeuvre
> I'm working on imagemagick on behalf of the Debian LTS team and just > noticed this bug report. > > I have reproduced this issue in jessie, and can confirm that this > regression is still present in 8:6.8.9.9-5+deb8u18. I can also confirm > that the regression was introduced between patch 0224

Bug#870273: imagemagick: regression in 8:6.8.9.9-5+deb8u10

2019-12-27 Thread Hugo Lefeuvre
Hi, I'm working on imagemagick on behalf of the Debian LTS team and just noticed this bug report. I have reproduced this issue in jessie, and can confirm that this regression is still present in 8:6.8.9.9-5+deb8u18. I can also confirm that the regression was introduced between patch 0224 and

Bug#870273: imagemagick: regression in 8:6.8.9.9-5+deb8u10

2017-07-31 Thread Marc Deslauriers
Package: imagemagick Version: 8:6.8.9.9-5+deb8u10 Severity: normal Ubuntu imagemagick security updates are based on Debian security updates. The latest round of jessie updates introduced a regression. Please see the downstream bug report for a reproducer script: