On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 07:06:46AM +0100, Edmund Grimley Evans wrote:
>
> "portability.patch" is commented out in debian/patches/series and was
> not applied?
Thanks for watching me. ;-)
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
> unfortunately the bug does not seem to be sufficient. See
>
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=jellyfish=arm64=2.2.6-5=1504220784=0
>
> Any further hints?
"portability.patch" is commented out in debian/patches/series and was
not applied?
control: reopen -1
Hi Edmund,
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 10:24:39PM +0100, Edmund Grimley Evans wrote:
> > Sorry, but this patch does not apply. You have recommended a change
> > of the *original* code. That's no proper quilt patch.
>
> Indeed. Here's another attempt.
unfortunately the bug does
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 09:24:48PM +0100, Edmund Grimley Evans wrote:
> > > Instead of: "pand " off
> > > It should be: "pand " #off
> >
> > please excuse my ignorance for ASM - but could you please simply send
> > me a corrected quilt patch. I do not understand what you mean.
>
>
Hi Edmund,
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 07:11:59PM +0100, Edmund Grimley Evans wrote:
> Instead of: "pand " off
> It should be: "pand " #off
please excuse my ignorance for ASM - but could you please simply send
me a corrected quilt patch. I do not understand what you mean.
> (It may be necessary
Instead of: "pand " off
It should be: "pand " #off
(It may be necessary to disable "-Werror": an unrelated issue.)
Source: jellyfish
Version: 2.2.6-1
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: arm64
Jellyfish seems to be easy to port. Just provide alternatives to the
inline assembler in rectangular_binary_matrix.hpp:
#ifdef __x86_64__
#define AND_XOR(off)\
7 matches
Mail list logo
