(Sorry for missing In-Reply-To: and References:)
Hi all,
I was just pointed to this bug, which seems quite similar as #827065.
Should these be merged?
Also, as I wrote in #827065: I'm highly interested in getting this into
uscan, and I would like to take care of this. But: I need a mentor, as
On Wed 2017-09-20 01:47:00 +0200, Tomasz Buchert wrote:
> So let's assume that git-archive can produce a reproducible,
> uncompressed tarball, given a particular githash. Why not ask
> interested upstream developers to do something like that:
>
> git tag -s TAGNAME -m "$(git archive --format tar
On 16/08/17 21:01, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Hi Guillem--
>
> On Thu 2017-08-17 01:05:46 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > It seems to me like you are perhaps trying to reimplement dpkg source
> > format «3.0 (git)» (described in man dpkg-source)? :)
>
> Thanks for that pointer, it does seem
Hi!
On Wed, 2017-08-16 at 21:01:31 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Thu 2017-08-17 01:05:46 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > It seems to me like you are perhaps trying to reimplement dpkg source
> > format «3.0 (git)» (described in man dpkg-source)? :)
>
> Thanks for that pointer, it does
Hi Guillem--
On Thu 2017-08-17 01:05:46 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> It seems to me like you are perhaps trying to reimplement dpkg source
> format «3.0 (git)» (described in man dpkg-source)? :)
Thanks for that pointer, it does seem similar.
I was hoping that we could produce an actual
Hi!
On Fri, 2017-08-11 at 14:15:28 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Package: devscripts
> Priority: wishlist
> Control: affects -1 + dpkg git-buildpackage pristine-tar
> X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@packages.debian.org, git-buildpack...@packages.debian.org,
> pristine-...@packages.debian.org
> I'm not
On Fri 2017-08-11 20:51:25 -0400, Osamu Aoki wrote:
>> In my experience, if the goal is to create a minimal "shallow clone
>> snapshot" of the git archive, it's quite often the case that i as the
>> packager already have a full clone of the upstream repo i'm working on.
>
> Yah but tool needs to
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 06:59:02PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> On Fri 2017-08-11 15:09:41 -0400, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > I was just talking about similar things on
> > debian-pol...@lists.debian.org and Bug#811565.
>
> thanks for the pointer! 811565 seems to be about repos without tags,
>
On Fri 2017-08-11 15:09:41 -0400, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> I was just talking about similar things on
> debian-pol...@lists.debian.org and Bug#811565.
thanks for the pointer! 811565 seems to be about repos without tags,
and i'm interested in repos signed tags, so i think the use cases are
slightly
Hi,
I was just talking about similar things on
debian-pol...@lists.debian.org and Bug#811565.
Also git tag and git HEAD packaging support is currently in progress.
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 02:15:28PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Package: devscripts
> Priority: wishlist
> Control: affects
Package: devscripts
Priority: wishlist
Control: affects -1 + dpkg git-buildpackage pristine-tar
X-Debbugs-Cc: d...@packages.debian.org, git-buildpack...@packages.debian.org,
pristine-...@packages.debian.org
Hi devscripts, dpkg, git-buildpackage, pristine-tar folks--
It's awesome to see the
11 matches
Mail list logo
