Hi Ximin,
> It might be safer to subclass QHash into a deterministic QDetHash or
> something. This would allow one to use QHash both non-deterministically (to
> protect against DoS attacks) and deterministically in the same program,
> depending on the use-case.
>
> For example, the rust
Hi Ximin,
> It might be safer to subclass QHash into a deterministic QDetHash or
> something. This would allow one to use QHash both non-deterministically (to
> protect against DoS attacks) and deterministically in the same program,
> depending on the use-case.
>
> For example, the rust
Federico Brega:
> Hello,
>
> I'm packaging an application making use of pyrcc5 and I noticed the
> nondeterminism it adds.
> I see[1] that this is currently description is not correct.
> You can see that pyrcc5 uses QHash, which is made to avoid algorithmic
> complexity attacks[2]
> introducing a
3 matches
Mail list logo
