On 2018-01-17 06:31, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Looks like we need to move to pocl 1.0 and llvm 4.0, unfortunately
> that will need another pass through NEW, since the SOVERSION was bumped.
1.0 is in experimental/NEW, still using llvm 3.9 to avoid the build
failure on i386
0.14 has been switched
Followup-For: Bug #873417
Hi,
I got distracted from pocl over the holidays, but today I finally took a
look again.
This is the current self test result matrix of the different pocl and llvm
versions on amd64 and i386:
amd64 i386testsuite time (amd64)
(there
Dear pocl maintainers,
How can I help? Is there any assistance that you require for updating pocl in
unstable? Does this require the new upstream version (1.0) for LLVM
compatibility or are there lots of other problems to address too?
cheers
Stuart
--
Stuart Prescott
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 07:49:11PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Thanks, I'll take a look ...
I saw that today you did an upload to experimental switching to LLVM
3.9.
Be aware that that's not good enouhg, as we also want to remove that
version (actually, we are just about to kick it out of
The main issue seems to be that pocl has switched to CMake. I’ve fixed this
locally and it builds and passes all the tests, it just looks like the symbols
files need to be updated which I’m not sure how to do properly.
I don’t have write access to collab-maint so couldn’t push the CMake fix, so
On 2017-11-21 18:12, James Price wrote:
> The main issue seems to be that pocl has switched to CMake. I’ve fixed this
> locally and it builds and passes all the tests, it just looks like the
> symbols files need to be updated which I’m not sure how to do properly.
>
> I don’t have write access
Hi,
I realised that there is a new upstream version 0.14 which seems to
allow LLVM 4.0. I gave it a try in Git in the new branch 0.14 but faced
build problems I was not able to solve. However, since I was hoping
that the refreshed patches might help (please review!) I commited this
branch.
Control: severity -1 serious
On Sun, 27 Aug 2017 16:01:25 +0200 (CEST) sylves...@debian.org (Sylvestre Ledru)
wrote:
> Source: pocl
> Severity: normal
>
> Hello,
>
> Currently, we have 6 versions of the llvm toolchain in the archive.
> I would like to move to 3 versions (4.0, 5.0 and snapshot,
Source: pocl
Severity: normal
Hello,
Currently, we have 6 versions of the llvm toolchain in the archive.
I would like to move to 3 versions (4.0, 5.0 and snapshot, aka 6.0)
Could you please update your package to use 4.0 (or, better, 5.0 which will be
released very
soon)?
I will update the
9 matches
Mail list logo
