Hi!
On Wed, 2017-09-06 at 19:18:33 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2017-09-02, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 04:51:55PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > > In addition to the above, I'm actually somewhat uncomfortable with this
> > > request, as it looks like a massive privac
On 2017-09-02, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 04:51:55PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
>> > during discussing #844431 it became clear, that some information about the
>> > running kernel should be included in .buildinfo files, as this can affect
>> > the
>> > build.
>>
>> It is actu
Over on 873...@bugs.debian.org, Holger Levsen wrote:
> on reflection I agree that the privacy implications are too bad.
>
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 04:51:55PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> [more insightful stuff I cannot disagree with removed.]
>
>> Given all the above, I'm inclined to just close
Hi Guillem,
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 04:51:55PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > during discussing #844431 it became clear, that some information about the
> > running kernel should be included in .buildinfo files, as this can affect
> > the
> > build.
>
> It is actually not very clear to me. The
Hi!
On Fri, 2017-09-01 at 11:25:11 +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Source: dpkg
> Version: 1.8.24
> Severity: wishlist
> User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> Usertags: toolchain
> X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> during discussing #844431 it became clear, tha
Source: dpkg
Version: 1.8.24
Severity: wishlist
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: toolchain
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-b...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi Guillem,
during discussing #844431 it became clear, that some information about the
running kernel should be included in
6 matches
Mail list logo
