Bug#874013: libgl1-mesa-glx: transitional library package should not be Arch: all

2017-09-06 Thread Timo Aaltonen
On 06.09.2017 13:11, Simon McVittie wrote: > Control: reopen -1 > Control: found -1 17.2.0-1 > > On Fri, 01 Sep 2017 at 23:08:26 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: >> It would not be a correct solution to mark libgl1-mesa-glx:all as >> M-A: foreign, because if it was, this dependency chain would be >>

Bug#874013: libgl1-mesa-glx: transitional library package should not be Arch: all

2017-09-06 Thread Simon McVittie
Control: reopen -1 Control: found -1 17.2.0-1 On Fri, 01 Sep 2017 at 23:08:26 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > It would not be a correct solution to mark libgl1-mesa-glx:all as > M-A: foreign, because if it was, this dependency chain would be > considered to be valid: > > steam:i386 ->

Bug#874013: libgl1-mesa-glx: transitional library package should not be Arch: all

2017-09-01 Thread Simon McVittie
Package: libgl1-mesa-glx Version: 17.2.0~rc6-1 Severity: important The libgl1-mesa-glx transitional package that exists after the libglvnd transition is Architecture: all, but this is not appropriate when a foreign-architecture package like Steam might depend on it. On an amd64 system: *