Bug#875531: "editor +42 filename" -- accept or reject?

2021-05-19 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 12:11:08PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > On Tue 18 May 2021 at 01:42PM +02, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > > Seconded. > > Thanks. I looked at applying this patch but the version we have in git > doesn't apply to 'next' without first applying the patch in #682347. > Mattia, wou

Bug#875531: "editor +42 filename" -- accept or reject?

2021-05-18 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Tue 18 May 2021 at 01:42PM +02, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Seconded. Thanks. I looked at applying this patch but the version we have in git doesn't apply to 'next' without first applying the patch in #682347. Mattia, would you be interested in reviewing and seconding that one too, so I c

Bug#875531: "editor +42 filename" -- accept or reject?

2021-05-18 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
Inline an editorial bit that I suggest for what I consider better flow. On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 12:27:27AM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote: > On Fri 02 Apr 2021 at 10:46AM -07, Russ Allbery wrote: > > > diff --git a/policy/ch-customized-programs.rst > > b/policy/ch-customized-programs.rst > > index 27

Bug#875531: "editor +42 filename" -- accept or reject?

2021-05-18 Thread Sean Whitton
Hello, On Fri 02 Apr 2021 at 10:46AM -07, Russ Allbery wrote: > diff --git a/policy/ch-customized-programs.rst > b/policy/ch-customized-programs.rst > index 27abebd..d58e297 100644 > --- a/policy/ch-customized-programs.rst > +++ b/policy/ch-customized-programs.rst > @@ -93,6 +93,14 @@ alternativ

Bug#875531: "editor +42 filename" -- accept or reject?

2021-04-02 Thread Russ Allbery
Adam Borowski writes: > Now that you folks are dealing with the "editor" virtual package, and, > what interests me here, the alternative for /usr/bin/editor -- could you > please process this proposal as well, and either accept or close it? > My point is that, all but one (e3) current alternativ

Bug#875531: "editor +42 filename" -- accept or reject?

2021-04-02 Thread Adam Borowski
Hi! Now that you folks are dealing with the "editor" virtual package, and, what interests me here, the alternative for /usr/bin/editor -- could you please process this proposal as well, and either accept or close it? My point is that, all but one (e3) current alternatives allow positioning the cur