Bug#876148: ust: FTBFS w/GCJ (on hppa)

2017-09-21 Thread Michael Jeanson
On 2017-09-20 21:52, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > Michael Jeanson writes: > >> The ust java bindings won't build with gcj, however they are optional >> and not required for a normal use of ust. I'd like to just disable them >> on platforms that don't have an openjdk port, I added a 'nojava' [1] >> buil

Bug#876148: ust: FTBFS w/GCJ (on hppa)

2017-09-20 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Michael Jeanson writes: > The ust java bindings won't build with gcj, however they are optional > and not required for a normal use of ust. I'd like to just disable them > on platforms that don't have an openjdk port, I added a 'nojava' [1] > build profile [2] to the packaging code that could be

Bug#876148: ust: FTBFS w/GCJ (on hppa)

2017-09-20 Thread Michael Jeanson
On 2017-09-18 21:54, Aaron M. Ucko wrote: > Source: ust > Version: 2.9.1-1 > Severity: important > Tags: upstream > Justification: fails to build from source > User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org > > Builds of ust with GCJ (to which default-jdk necessarily still boils > down on hppa, admittedly not

Bug#876148: ust: FTBFS w/GCJ (on hppa)

2017-09-18 Thread Aaron M. Ucko
Source: ust Version: 2.9.1-1 Severity: important Tags: upstream Justification: fails to build from source User: debian-h...@lists.debian.org Builds of ust with GCJ (to which default-jdk necessarily still boils down on hppa, admittedly not a release architecture) have been failing: CLASSPATH=.:.