On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 08:24:06AM -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
>
>
> On September 26, 2017 1:54:34 AM EDT, Olly Betts wrote:
> >On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:37:34PM -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
> >> I would think the person who was trying to use wx.html2 might not
> >> agree with
On September 26, 2017 1:54:34 AM EDT, Olly Betts wrote:
>On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:37:34PM -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
>> On Tue, 26 Sep 2017, Olly Betts wrote:
>> >If we revert the change which added this package apart from one hunk
>in
>> >debian/rules then we get a package
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 10:37:34PM -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Sep 2017, Olly Betts wrote:
> >If we revert the change which added this package apart from one hunk in
> >debian/rules then we get a package set which simply doesn't have
> >wx.html2 (rather than a broken one), which seems
On Tue, 26 Sep 2017, Olly Betts wrote:
On Tue, 26 Sep 2017, Olly Betts wrote:
So it might not actually be as easy as you might think to disable
webview here before we disable it in wxwidgets3.0...
I'll kick off a build and see. If it doesn't just work, I'm inclined
to disable this at the
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 08:54:16PM -0400, Scott Talbert wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Sep 2017, Olly Betts wrote:
> >So it might not actually be as easy as you might think to disable
> >webview here before we disable it in wxwidgets3.0...
> >
> >I'll kick off a build and see. If it doesn't just work, I'm
On Tue, 26 Sep 2017, Olly Betts wrote:
Looks like this package was partly enabled to fix a problem with the
build without it:
https://bugs.debian.org/821934
So it might not actually be as easy as you might think to disable
webview here before we disable it in wxwidgets3.0...
I'll kick off a
6 matches
Mail list logo