Bug#877949: Package description: do you really mean "offload"?

2017-10-09 Thread MJ Ray
Christian Seiler wrote: > I'm open to improving the package description, but I do want to keep > the work "offload" in a prominent position there, as that is the > standard technical term in this field, and people who want to use that > functionality will search for that word. I agree that "offl

Bug#877949: Package description: do you really mean "offload"?

2017-10-07 Thread Christian Seiler
Hi, On 10/07/2017 10:56 PM, Martin Eberhard Schauer wrote: > Package: iscsiuio > Version: 2.0.874-3~deb9u1 > Severity: wishlist > X-Debbugs-CC: debian-l10n-engl...@lists.debian.org > > the last paragraph of the package description [1] and its short > description sound strange to me. > >   "This

Bug#877949: Package description: do you really mean "offload"?

2017-10-07 Thread Justin B Rye
Martin Eberhard Schauer wrote: > "This package is required to offload iSCSI onto these devices." > > Not being a native English speaker, I found [2]. Thus I believe that > "offload" and "onto" don't fit together. And I'm wondering what would > be a better wording. > > Perhaps > "You need this

Bug#877949: Package description: do you really mean "offload"?

2017-10-07 Thread Martin Eberhard Schauer
Package: iscsiuio Version: 2.0.874-3~deb9u1 Severity: wishlist X-Debbugs-CC: debian-l10n-engl...@lists.debian.org Dear Maintainers, the last paragraph of the package description [1] and its short description sound strange to me. "This package is required to offload iSCSI onto these devices."