Em dom, 2017-10-22 às 21:03 +0200, Adam Borowski escreveu:
> You'd need to either:
> * put the differences as a patch: have the previous .orig tarball in the
> parent directory and do "dpkg-source --commit", or
> * release a new upstream tarball with a bumped version (as you're upstream)
As you
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 03:24:06PM -0200, Carlos Donizete Froes wrote:
> Em dom, 2017-10-22 às 14:53 +0200, Adam Borowski escreveu:
> > Alas, the version on mentors.d.n is 1.1-1, same as in unstable.
> > You'd need to bump it -- the previous upload is already there, set in stone,
> > and it can be
Em dom, 2017-10-22 às 14:53 +0200, Adam Borowski escreveu:
> Alas, the version on mentors.d.n is 1.1-1, same as in unstable.
> You'd need to bump it -- the previous upload is already there, set in stone,
> and it can be only superseded but not changed.
Hi,
I added mentors.d.n to version 1.1-2 of
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 04:17:48AM -0200, Carlos Donizete Froes wrote:
> Em sex, 2017-10-20 às 20:40 +0200, Adam Borowski escreveu:
> > As my arm64 laptop is currently out, I tried via x-forwarding on a headless
> > Pine64. It seems to work!
> >
> > Thus, unless someone comes with evidence to
Em sex, 2017-10-20 às 20:40 +0200, Adam Borowski escreveu:
> As my arm64 laptop is currently out, I tried via x-forwarding on a headless
> Pine64. It seems to work!
>
> Thus, unless someone comes with evidence to the contrary, it seems
> reasonable to assume the package works on all
Em sex, 2017-10-20 às 20:35 +0200, Adam Borowski escreveu:
> The vast majority of computers have no joystick anyway, thus having no
> support for it on non-linux architectures is no big deal.
>
> Also, from what I heard, kfreebsd users want it for certain servery
> features, not to play games,
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 03:09:20PM -0200, Carlos Donizete Froes wrote:
> The emulator worked fine on the linux architectures, so I put the 'd/control'
> any-amd64 any-i386.
>
> I can even change this to see if it will accept other architectures.
As my arm64 laptop is currently out, I tried via
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 03:09:20PM -0200, Carlos Donizete Froes wrote:
> Em sex, 2017-10-20 às 13:41 +0200, Adam Borowski escreveu:
> > Looks like it's wrong:
> > The only point in writing "any-amd64 any-i386" instead of "amd64 i386 x32"
> > (it's pretty unobvious any-amd64 includes x32 but it
Em sex, 2017-10-20 às 13:41 +0200, Adam Borowski escreveu:
> Looks like it's wrong:
> The only point in writing "any-amd64 any-i386" instead of "amd64 i386 x32"
> (it's pretty unobvious any-amd64 includes x32 but it does) would be to allow
> non-linux architectures like kfreebsd-* or hurd-*. But,
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 02:21:03AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 11:24:11PM -0200, Carlos Donizete Froes wrote:
> + * New upstream release
> + * Switch to compat level 10
> + * debian/control:
> ++ Build-Depends: libgl1-mesa-dev, mesa-common-dev
> ++
10 matches
Mail list logo
