Hi.
First... shouldn't there have been at least some NEWS entry if
something like this is enabled?
Many people will not have even the apprmor packages/policies
installed... yet apparently it is still active.
All kinds of programs seem to fail now... e.g. tor won't start anymore,
aptitude cannot
Hi,
Christoph Anton Mitterer:
> First... shouldn't there have been at least some NEWS entry if
> something like this is enabled?
Indeed, it would have been nice. Can you please report a bug against
src:linux about it?
> All kinds of programs seem to fail now... e.g. tor won't start anymore,
> a
intrigeri:
> Christoph Anton Mitterer:
>> All kinds of programs seem to fail now... e.g. tor won't start anymore,
>> aptitude cannot download changelogs.
> Ouch! Sorry about that. May you please report dedicated bugs about
> these, attaching the AppArmor log denials?
Wrt. tor, someone else repor
On Wed, 2017-11-01 at 07:40 +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> Indeed, it would have been nice. Can you please report a bug against
> src:linux about it?
I already had:
#880441
> Ouch! Sorry about that. May you please report dedicated bugs about
> these, attaching the AppArmor log denials?
I saw these:
On Wed, 2017-11-01 at 08:19 +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> Wrt. aptitude, it's the first time I ever hear about aptitude being
> affected by AppArmor so I'm eager to read your bug report :)
Hmm that may be unrelated... pressing "C" on a package (to get the
changelogs) didn't work (and I blindly guessed
Hi,
Meta: this bug report is about deciding how we enable AppArmor by
default; if you want to follow-up on unrelated discussions or start
new ones, please do so in better suited places :)
Christoph Anton Mitterer:
> On Wed, 2017-11-01 at 07:40 +0100, intrigeri wrote:
>> Indeed, it would have been
6 matches
Mail list logo
